Kombinasi Metode Simple Additive Weigthing dan Weigthed Product Untuk Seleksi Proposal Program Kreatifitas Mahasiswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v5i2.2929Keywords:
Simple Additive Weighting, Weighted Product, Combination Algotritma, Student ProposalAbstract
This Research aims to develop a decision support system that can facilitate the proposal selection process and provide an alternative ranking for the selection results of student creativity program proposal selection. This decision support system uses a combination calculation of the Simple Additive Weighting and Weigthted Product methods, hereinafter referred to as Modified SAW. The criteria used in this assessment refer to the 2020 Student Creativity Program Guidebook. The data used in this decision support system uses proposal selection data in the Student Creativity Development Unit of Muhammadiyah University of North Sumatra in 2019 for 2020. This system was developed by determining criteria and weight determination using the Simple Additive Weighting method and then make improvements to the weight and determine the preference value using the Weighted Product method. Each of the SAW and WP methods certainly has advantages and disadvantages. The advantages of SAW with a simple and simple ranking process, can be applied to decision-making cases such as in the recommendation of selecting proposals with various attributes. While the use of Weighted Product (WP) is often used because the weight is calculated based on the level of importance and can evaluate the set of attributes by multiplying all criteria with alternative results as well as the power between weights and alternative multiplication results. This WP method can also be used in assisting in recommendation of proposal selection based on what is needed by the University. By utilizing the advantages and disadvantages of each method, this combination is able to produce an accuracy of 91% for the SAW method, 97% for the accuracy using the WP and 99% for the accuracy value for the combination of the SAW and WP methods. This decision support system using MOD SAW can help facilitate the proposal selection process and provide alternative ranking results. Further research is suggested for the development of a decision support system for proposal selection using a combination of different methods between SAW and other methods.References
P. Program, K. Mahasiswa, and P. 2017 Umum, Buku-Pedoman-PKM-2020. .
K. A. E. T. Luthfi, “Algoritma Data Mining Yogyakarta,†pp. 149–176, 2009.
K. Kholidun and T. Pinandita, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Berbasis Web Untuk Menentukan Kelayakan Proposal Penelitian Pada Lembaga Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto,†None, vol. II, no. 1, pp. 51–63, 2012.
Adriyendi, “Multi-Attribute Decision Making Using Simple Additive Weighting and Weighted Product in Food Choice,†Int. J. Inf. Eng. Electron. Bus., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 8–14, 2015.
Z. Y. Mubarak, E. Utami, and E. T. Luthfi, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENYELEKSIAN KELAYAKAN PROPOSAL PENELITIAN DOSEN MENGGUNAKAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING DAN WEIGHT PRODUCT,†pp. 109–114, 2018.
G. J. Maulany, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Usulan Penelitian Dosen Internal Unmus Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product(Wp),†Mustek Anim Ha, vol. 4, no. 3, 2016.
D. Belmawa, “Program Kreativitas Mahasiswa - Pedoman Umum,†pp. 1–289, 2021.
P. Ambika et al., “The best of village head performance: Simple additive weighting method,†Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 8, no. 2 Special Issue 3, pp. 1568–1572, 2019.
S. Sundari, Karmila, M. N. Fadli, D. Hartama, A. P. Windarto, and A. Wanto, “Decision Support System on Selection of Lecturer Research Grant Proposals using Preferences Selection Index,†J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1255, no. 1, 2019.
C. S. Journal, S. Pada, S. M. K. Negeri, and P. Kerinci, “J u r nal i lmu komputer,†vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 64–69, 2019.
T. Limbong et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode & Implementasi. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.
R. Yanto and D. Apriadi, “Penerapan Metode Weighted Product untuk Seleksi Kelayakan Proposal Program Kreativitas Mahasiswa,†Telematika, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 46, 2019.
C. P. Shinta Amelia, “Uji Kinerja Metode Weighted Product Dan Simple Additive Weighting,†Teh. Inform., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2019.
S. Solikhun, “PERBANDINGAN METODE WEIGHTED PRODUCT DAN WEIGHTED SUM MODEL DALAM PEMILIHAN PERGURUAN SWASTA TERBAIK JURUSAN KOMPUTER,†KLIK - Kumpul. J. ILMU Komput., 2017.
A. S. Purnomo and J. Ariyanti, “Rekomendasi Pemilihan Produk Simpanan Tabungan Bank Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product (WP),†INFORMAL Informatics J., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1, 2019.
A. Abdullah et al., “Simposium Nasional Teknologi Terapan (SNTT) 2013 ISSN 2339-028X,†Telematika, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1180–1188, 2018.
Kusrini, “Kusrini.pdf.†.
S. R. Ningsih and A. P. Windarto, “Penerapan Metode Promethee II pada Dosen Penerima Hibah P2M Internal,†InfoTekJar (Jurnal Nas. Inform. dan Teknol. Jaringan), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
