Penggunaan Metode AHP dan Topsis dalam Pemilihan Penyedia Suku Cadang Instalasi Perawatan Sarana Rumah Sakit

Authors

  • Wahid Al Jufri Universitas Nasional, Jakarta
  • Agung Triayudi Universitas Nasional, Jakarta
  • Ben Rahman Universitas Nasional, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v6i4.4497

Keywords:

Decision Support, AHP, Topsis, IPSRS, Website

Abstract

Determination in choosing a supplier is one of the strategic programs and needs to be more objective, often the decision making in choosing a supplier is only based on intuition, habit and experience, until now there is no mechanism or method for this that is suitable or only according to universal select criteria. Hospital Facility Maintenance Facility (IPSRS) is a facility that oversees all maintenance and repair work on non-medical facilities at the National Brain Center Hospital, including building maintenance, electrical systems, plumbing, AC management, surveillance camera or CCTV maintenance, and motor generator repair. and telephone control generator. To select the expected spare parts supplier, it is necessary to apply the SPK Ideal Solution Similarity Order Preference Technique (TOPSIS) method and combine it with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to facilitate the process of selecting more than one alternative. The criteria determined in this study are S1 with Price, S2 with Quality, S3 with Speed and S4 with Completeness. With these criteria, it can be used as material to determine the Decision Support carried out by the system. In the results of this study the determination of the criteria using AHP with the results of the Consistency Ratio value of 0.004 which means if the value is above 0.01 then the results are declared consistent. As well as for the design using the Topsis method, the positive ideal solution on the criteria S1 is worth 0.13282, S2 is worth 0.07954, S3 is 0.04085 and S4 is 0.0422. Meanwhile, for the negative ideal solution, S1 is worth 0.04981, S2 is 0.02983, S3 is 0.02043 and S4 is 0.0211. The first rank is P7 with a value of 0.813 and the last order is P8 with a value of 0.13. So, from the results of the assessment carried out by the system based on the weight value for ranking using the TOPSIS method which occupies the top three positions, PT. Cipta Karya Teknik with a total of 0.813 or 81.3%, followed by PT. Karya Mandiri Indonesia with a total of 0.802 or 80.2%, and PT. Indah Harapan Nusa with a total of 0.796 or 79.6%. As for the bottom three positions are PT. Tunggal Teknik Indo with a total of 0.292 or 29.2%, then PT.Harapan Maju Bersama which has a total of 0.139 or 13.9% and the last one is PT. Forward Rise Simultaneously with a value of 0.130 or 13%.

References

A. O. Putri and E. Prasetyaningrum, “Perancangan dan Implementasi Pemilihan Supplier Obat Menggunakan Metode AHP,†vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1353–1361, 2021, doi: 10.30865/mib.v5i4.3236.

A. Wibowo, U. B. Luhur, P. Korespondensi, and S. V. Regression, “PREDIKSI JUMLAH PENGIRIMAN BARANG MENGGUNAKAN KOMBINASI METODE SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION , ALGORITMA GENETIKA DAN FREIGHT SHIPPING PREDICTION USING COMBINATION OF SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION , GENETIC ALGORITHM AND MULTIVARIATE ADAPTIVE SPLINES,†vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1169–1176, 2020, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.202072441.

Y. A. Kanthi, B. K. Kristanto, M. Informatika, T. Informatika, P. Korespondensi, and N. Corner, “IMPLEMENTASI METODE NORTH WEST CORNER DAN STEPPING STONE IMPLEMENTATION OF NORTH-WEST CORNER METHOD AND STEPPING STONE METHOD FOR SHIPPING GOODS TO THE BIMASAKTI GALLERY,†vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 845–852, 2020, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.202071625.

M. Mukharir and R. Wardoyo, “Decision Support System for Laptop Selection Using AHP Method and Profile Matching,†vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 307–316, 2021.

A. Saputra, “Analisis Kepuasan Pelanggan terhadap Kualitas Data Envelopment Analysis ( DEA ) di Kota Meulaboh,†vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 82–96, 2021.

G. S. Mahendra and I. P. Y. Indrawan, “METODE AHP-TOPSIS PADA SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN,†vol. 9, no. 2, 2020.

B. Dengan, M. Ahp, D. Topsis, S. Kasus, and D. Sambongbangi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Bibit Padi,†vol. 10, pp. 162–169, 2021.

F. Marina, U. Hasiani, T. Haryanti, and L. Kurniawati, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Produk Ritel dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process,†vol. 10, pp. 152–162, 2021.

M. Analytical, H. Process, A. H. P. Dan, and A. W. Saw, “Pada apotek pusaka arta dengan metode,†pp. 405–410.

N. U. Hayatunnisa, S. Soepangat, and C. Windiyaningsih, “Analisis Penerapan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Rumah Sakit Di Unit Perawatan Intensif Rumah Sakit Kepresidenan RSPAD Gatot Soebroto Jakarta Tahun 2018,†vol. 4, no. 1, 2020.

S. Wardani, I. Parlina, and A. Revi, “ANALISIS PERHITUNGAN METODE MOORA DALAM PEMILIHAN SUPPLIER BAHAN BANGUNAN DI TOKO MEGAH GRACINDO JAYA InfoTekJar ( Jurnal Nasional Informatika dan Teknologi Jaringan ),†pp. 95–99.

J. Media and I. Budidarma, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Promosi Jabatan Dengan Kombinasi Metode AHP dan MFep,†vol. 5, 2021, doi: 10.30865/mib.v5i1.2293.

J. Media and I. Budidarma, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Promosi Jabatan Dengan Kombinasi Metode AHP dan MFEP,†vol. 6, no. April, pp. 768–776, 2022, doi: 10.30865/mib.v6i2.3550.

A. Fauzi and T. Hidayatulloh, “Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Pada PT . Telecom Visitama Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process,†vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 65–71, 2017.

N. Rahmayani, M. Syarif, U. Bina, S. Informatika, U. Bina, and S. Informatika, “Pengambilan Keputusan Memilih Sekolah Dengan Metode AHP,†vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 143–150, 2019.

G. Surya, P. Gede, and S. Cipta, “Komparasi Metode AHP-SAW dan AHP-WP pada SPK Penentuan E-Commerce Terbaik di Indonesia Comparison of AHP-SAW and AHP-WP Methods on DSS to Determine the Best E-Commerce in Indonesia,†vol. 08, no. 4, pp. 346–356, 2020, doi: 10.26418/justin.v8i4.42611.

A. Mubarok, H. D. Suherman, Y. Ramdhani, and S. Topiq, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Pemberian Kredit Dengan Metode TOPSIS,†vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 2019.

G. Wibisono and A. Amrulloh, “Penerapan metode topsis dalam penentuan dosen terbaik 1,†vol. 11, no. 28, pp. 102–109, 2019.

H. A. Septilia, “Sistem pendukung keputusan pemberian dana bantuan menggunakan metode ahp,†vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 34–41, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-25

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 4 (2022): Oktober 2022

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).