Perbandingan Metode AHP dan TOPSIS untuk Pemilihan Karyawan Berprestasi

Authors

  • Musri Iskandar Nasution Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta
  • Abdul Fadlil Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta
  • Sunardi Sunardi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v6i3.4194

Keywords:

Decision Support System, AHP, TOPSIS

Abstract

This study designed a system to determine outstanding employee selection using a Decision Support System (DSS) with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The purpose of this study is to analyze the accuracy in making decisions. The stages of this research are collecting employee data and criteria data, then weighting the criteria and assessment, after that the calculation uses the AHP and TOPSIS methods, and the last step is the analysis of the calculation results and the calculation of accuracy. The criteria used are attendance, years of service, permission, and discipline. Implementation for building applications using the PHP programming language and MySQL database. The results of the calculation of the accuracy obtained by the AHP method are 100%, as well as the TOPSIS method at 100%. The results of the AHP calculation show that the first rank results are obtained with a value of 0.02525, namely employees with code K8, while the results of the TOPSIS calculation show that the first rank results are obtained with a value of 0.955236913, namely employees with code K8. This shows that the two methods have the same results in determining the first rank of employees, however the TOPSIS method is better than AHP because the TOPSIS calculation process is carried out twice normalization so that it does not produce the same value.

References

A. R. D. R. Sartika, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode MOORA,†Semin. Nas. Sains Teknol. Inf., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 73–82, 2021.

T. Prihatin and T. Retnasari, “Implementasi Metode Topsis Dalam Sistem Keputusan Penentuan Karyawan Terbaik,†Ijccs, vol. x, No.x, no. x, pp. 1–5, 1978.

Haryani and D. Fitriani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Karyawan Terbaik Pada Collection Pt.Panin Bank Menggunakan Metode Profile Matching,†J. Mantik Penusa, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2019.

A. Armiyana and R. M. Candra, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Sekolah Anak Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Dan Metode Perbandingan Eksponensial (MPE),†J. CoreIT J. Has. Penelit. Ilmu Komput. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 31, 2018, doi: 10.24014/coreit.v3i1.3655.

M. A. Mude, “Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS pada kasus UMKM,†Ilk. J. Ilm., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 76–81, 2016, doi: 10.33096/ilkom.v8i2.49.76-81.

E. Ermin, S. Sunardi, and A. Fadlil, “Penerapan Metode Weight Product Pada Penentuan Penerimaan Karyawan,†Cybernetics, vol. 4, no. 01, p. 9, 2020, doi: 10.29406/cbn.v4i01.2074.

M. Adzan and F. Amin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Laptop Dengan Metode Analytical Hierarki Process (Ahp) Berbasis Web Mobile,†Proceeding SINTAK, no. 2001, pp. 367–373, 2019.

A. A. G. A. P. R. Asmara, “Implementasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Dalam Memprediksi Calon Mahasiswa Dropout STMIK STIKOM Bali,†Sist. Inform., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2016.

R. M. Simanjorang, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Dosen Terbaik dengan menggunakan Metode TOPSIS (Studi Kasus: STMIK Pelita Nusantara Medan),†MEANS (Media Inf. Anal. dan Sist., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2019, doi: 10.54367/means.v4i1.312.

M. R. Ridho, H. Hairani, K. A. Latif, and R. Hammad, “Kombinasi Metode AHP dan TOPSIS untuk Rekomendasi Penerima Beasiswa SMK Berbasis Sistem Pendukung Keputusan,†J. Tekno Kompak, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 26, 2021, doi: 10.33365/jtk.v15i1.905.

R. Samsaudin, Y. Agus Pranoto, and M. Orisa, “Implementasi Metode Ahp Dan Topsis Untuk Penilaian Karyawan Baru Di Cv. Originality Group Berbasis Web,†JATI (Jurnal Mhs. Tek. Inform., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 758–766, 2021, doi: 10.36040/jati.v5i2.3769.

N. Andriyani and A. Hafiz, “Perbandingan Metode AHP dan Topsis dalam Penentuan Siswa Berprestasi,†Semin. Nas. Teknol. Dan Bisnis 2018, pp. 362–371, 2018.

A. F. Kharis Hudaiby Hanif, Anton Yudhana, “Analisis Penilaian Guru Memakai Metode Analityc Heararchy Process ( AHP ),†Seri Pros. Semin. Nas. Din. Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 186–189, 2020.

N. Ranti et al., “Analisis Penentuan Penginapan dengan Metode AHP dan Promethee,†J. Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 02, no. 2, pp. 173–179, 2020.

T. K. Lina Listiani, Teuku Mufizar, “Karyawan Baru Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierachy Process dan Preference Ranking Organization Method For Enrichment Evaluation Ii ( Studi Kasus : PT . Adira Finance Tasikmalaya ),†pp. 115–126, 2022.

A. A. Azhari, Y. Nyura, and A. Najib, “Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS Pada Penerimaan Siswa Praktek Kerja Lapangan,†Semin. Nas. Ilmu Komput. dan Teknol. Inf. 2018, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2018.

D. R. Sari, A. P. Windarto, D. Hartama, and S. Solikhun, “Decision Support System for Thesis Graduation Recommendation Using AHP-TOPSIS Method,†J. Teknol. dan Sist. Komput., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2018, doi: 10.14710/jtsiskom.6.1.2018.1-6.

B. Harpad and S. Salmon, “Penerapan Metode Ahp Dan Metode Topsis Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Asisten Laboratorium Komputer Pada Stmik Widya Cipta Dharma Samarinda,†Sebatik, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 2018, doi: 10.46984/sebatik.v19i1.92.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-25

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2022): Juli 2022

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).