Penerapan Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) pada Pemilihan Broadcasting Terbaik

Authors

  • Karya Suhada STMIK Rosma, Karawang
  • Saludin Saludin Universitas Bina Insani, Bekasi
  • Abdurrahman Sadikin Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin
  • Indah Kusuma Dewi Universitas Ibnu Sina, Batam
  • Fifto Nugroho Universitas Bung Karno, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v7i2.5937

Keywords:

Decision Support System, MAUT Method, Broadcasting, Selection

Abstract

In an increasingly sophisticated era and increasingly modern life, entertaining content makes Broadcasting a promising job field. This resulted in many people being interested in broadcasting. Broadcasting is a job related to broadcasting. All parties who participate in broadcasting, both cameramen, presenters, content creators, writer creators and so on. Broadcasting is usually useful for those who want to upload videos to YouTube, Tiktok, Instagram and so on. Broadcasting selection is done manually, it will take a long time and a lot of effort. Therefore a decision support system is needed in order to assist interested parties in choosing the best Broadcasting. In using a decision support system using this ranking method, the method used is the Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) method. Based on the calculation results from the MAUT method, a result of 0.6731 is obtained with the alternative A7 On behalf of Bintang Simanjuntak as the best alternative that deserves to be accepted as Broadcasting.

References

J. Ma, H. Liu, C. Peng, and T. Qiu, “Unauthorized broadcasting identification: A deep LSTM recurrent learning approach,†IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 5981–5983, 2020.

R. Briandana and M. Irfan, “Broadcasting management: The strategy of television production configuring for sustainability in the digital era,†Int. J. English Lit. Soc. Sci., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1879–1886, 2019.

E. Ndruru, “Pemanfaatan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Seleksi PKW Terbaik Dengan Metode Aras Pada LPK2-Pascom Medan,†J. Inf. Log., vol. I, no. 2, pp. 26–34, 2019.

A. NURSYADANA, “ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS PENERIMAAN PAJAK KENDARAAN BERMOTOR (PKB) PADA UPTB SAMSAT MAMUJU PROVINSI SULAWESI BARAT.†2019.

W. M. Kifti and I. Hasian, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Merek Smartphone Terbaik Dalam Mendukung Belajar Online Mahasiswa Era Covid-19 Menggunakan Metode PSI ( Preference Selection Index ),†J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 762–768, 2021.

G. Surya, K. Yota, and E. Aryanto, “SPK Penentuan Lokasi ATM Menggunakan Metode AHP dan SAW,†vol. 01, pp. 49–56, 2019.

K. Fatmawati, A. P. Windarto, and M. R. Lubis, “Analisa SPK Dengan Metode AHP Dalam Menentukan Faktor Konsumen Dalam Melakukan Kredit Barang,†Konf. Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komput., vol. I, pp. 314–321, 2017.

D. Handoko, M. Mesran, S. D. Nasution, Y. Yuhandri, and H. Nurdiyanto, “Application Of Weight Sum Model (WSM) In Determining Special Allocation Funds Recipients,†IJICS (International J. Informatics Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 31–35, 2017.

N. P. Rizanti, L. T. Sianturi, and M. Sianturi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Pertukaran Pelajar Menggunakan Metode PSI (Preference Selection Index),†Semin. Nas. Teknol. Komput. dan Sains, pp. 263–269, 2019.

K. Perencanaan et al., “Covid-19, New Normal, dan Perencanaan Pembangunan di Indonesia,†J. Perenc. Pembang. Indones. J. Dev. Plan., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 240–252, 2020.

M. D. Saefudin and A. Mirza, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Penilaian Guru Terbaik Dengan Metode Multi-Attributive Border Approximation (MABAC),†OKTAL J. Ilmu Komput. dan Sains, vol. 1, no. 06, pp. 609–619, 2022.

C. F. Sianturi, L. T. Sianturi, U. Hasanah, Khairunnisa, and Mesran, “Decision Support System for Accepting Pre-Employment Cards during the Covid-19 Pandemic Using the Method Multi Objective Optimization on The Basic of Ratio Analysis (MOORA),†IJICS (International J. Informatics Comput. Sci., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 217–223, 2021.

A. Perdana and A. Budiman, “Analysis of Multi-attribute Utility Theory for College Ranking Decision Making,†SinkrOn, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 19, 2020.

Z. Allah Bukhsh, I. Stipanovic, G. Klanker, A. O’ Connor, and A. G. Doree, “Network level bridges maintenance planning using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory,†Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 872–885, 2019.

D. Aldo, N. Putra, and Z. Munir, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENILAIAN KINERJA DOSEN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE MULTI ATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY ( MAUT ) Dasril,†J. Sist. Inf. dan Manaj., vol. 7, no. 2, 2019.

S. Manurung, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Dan Pegawai Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Moora,†Simetris J. Tek. Mesin, Elektro dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 701–706, 2018.

T. Limbong et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode & Implementasi. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.

R. B. I. N. M Mesran, Syefudin, Sarif Surorejo, Muhammad Syahrizal, Aang Alim Murtopo, Zaenul Arif, Nugroho Adhi Santoso, Wresti Andriani, Soeb Aripin, Gunawan, Pengantar Teknologi Informasi. CV. Graha Mitra Edukasi, 2023.

D. Nofriansyah and S. Defit, Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. 2018.

A. S. Putra, D. R. Aryanti, and I. Hartati, “Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) sebagai Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Guru Berprestasi ( Studi Kasus : SMK Global Surya),†Pros. Semin. Nas. Darmajaya, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 85–97, 2018.

Nia Komalasari, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelaikan Terbang (SPK2T),†J. Ind. Elektro dan Penerbangan 4, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2016.

R. T. Aldisa, Sanwani, D. M. Simanjuntak, S. Laia, and Mesran, “Penerapan Metode Metode Multy Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dalam Pemilihan Asisten Laboratorium Komputer,†J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1782–1788, 2022.

Y. Ali and Aprina, “Penerapan Metode Preference Selection Index ( PSI ) Dalam Pemberian Dana BOS Pada Siswa Kurang Mampu,†Semin. Nas. Teknol. Komput. Sains, no. 1, pp. 590–597, 2019.

Y. Setiawan and S. Budilaksono, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mahasiswa Lulusan Terbaik Dengan Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (Maut) DiStmik Antar Bangsa,†Ikraith-Informatika, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 12–20, 2021.

H. R. Hatta, B. Pradana, and D. M. Khairina, “Kombinasi Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) pada Lomba Balita Sehat untuk Usia 6-24 Bulan,†Pros. Semin. Nas. Sist. Inf. dan Teknol. ke 4 Tahun 2020, pp. 244–249, 2020.

J. H. Lubis, S. Esabella, Mesran, Desyanti, and D. M. Simanjuntak, “Penerapan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Dalam Pemilihan Karyawan yang di Non-Aktifkan di Masa Pandemi,†J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 6, no. April, pp. 969–978, 2022.

A. Triayudi, J. D. Rajagukguk, and Mesran, “Implementasi Metode MAUT Dalam Menentukan Prioritas Produk Unggulan Daerah Dengan Menerapkan Pembobotan ROC,†J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 452–460, 2022.

A. A. Kusuma, Z. M. Arini, U. Hasanah, and Mesran, “Analisa Penerapan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dengan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) Dalam Pemilihan Lokasi Strategis Coffeshop Milenial di Era New Normal,†J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 51–59, 2021.

F. T. Waruwu and M. Mesran, “Comparative Analysis of Ranking Methods of WASPAS+ROC with Preference Selection Index (PSI) in Determining the Performance of Young Lecturers,†IJISTECH (International J. Inf. Syst. Technol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 207–214, 2021.

A. G. Simorangkir, K. Andika, and Mesran, “Analisis Penerapan MOORA Dalam Penyeleksian Peserta Olimpiade Catur dengan Metode Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid,†KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 49–59, 2021.

S. Silvilestari, “Penerapan Kombinasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Keputusan Pemberian Kredit,†J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 371, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-27

Issue

Section

Articles