Decision Support System for Determining New Branch Locations Applying the Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Method

Achmad Fikri Sallaby, Agung Triayudi, Kelik Sussolaikah, Muhammad Zakaria Lubis

Abstract


The location of new branches that are close to community activities and have adequate facilities makes it easier for consumers to get the services and products they need. Determining the feasibility of new branch locations from several product or service producers still uses a system that is not accurate, which can cause problems in determining the location of new strategic and targeted branches. However, there are several obstacles in the selection of new branch locations, so technological assistance is needed in determining the location, product analysis, marketing management, and other matters concerning the development of the business being carried out. Technology that is considered efficient, easy, and flexible and is used by entrepreneurs, especially in determining the location of new branches using a decision support system using the MAUT method, is expected to help the location of new branches that are efficient and strategic. The decision support system is a conclusion and determination of the best using some data and computerized testing in each criterion so as to get valid results. After calculating each criterion and alternative, the best ranking is obtained in alternative A1 with a value of 0.7925 on Pertahanan Street.

Keywords


DSS; New Branch Location; MAUT Method

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Giawa, P. S. Ramadhan, and A. Calam, “Penentuan Lokasi Cabang Baru Swalayan Menggunakan Preference Selection Index (PSI),†J. Sist. Inf. Triguna Dharma (JURSI TGD), vol. 1, no. 2, p. 98, 2022, doi: 10.53513/jursi.v1i2.5104.

D. Shandy and E. F. Ginting, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Lokasi Cabang Baru Menggunakan Metode ( WASPAS ),†vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 207–216, 2020.

R. T. Aldisa, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode ROC-WASPAS dan Entropy-WASPAS dalam Keputusan Pemberian Reward Kinerja Pegawai Hotel,†Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1212–1223, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i3.2562.

M. A. Abdullah and R. T. Aldisa, “Perbandingan Metode Preference Selection Index dan Kombinasi Preference Selection Index dan TOPSIS dalam Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Hotel,†KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1080–1087, 2023, doi: 10.30865/klik.v3i6.960.

B. Anwar, W. Simatupang, M. Muskhir, D. Irfan, and A. H. Nasyuha, “Kombinasi Penerapan Metode WASPAS dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Keputusan Pemilihan Teknologi Kamera Ponsel Terbaik,†Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1431–1437, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i3.2655.

R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapaan Metode TOPSIS dengan Pembobotan ROC dalam Seleksi Penerimaan Auditor Internal Perusahaan,†J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 7, no. April, pp. 828–836, 2023, doi: 10.30865/mib.v7i2.5899.

H. Ekawati and Y. Yunita, “Penerapan Metode MOOSRA dalam Rekomendasi Platform Investasi Emas Online Terbaik dengan Pembobotan ROC,†J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 778–786, 2023.

M. Mesran and U. R. Siregar, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Siswa Terbaik Pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama Menggunakan Metode Prfeence Selection Index ( PSI ),†Semin. Nas. Teknol. Komput. Sains, pp. 459–466, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://seminar-id.com/prosiding/index.php/sainteks/article/view/479/472

W. Harry, B. Lumban, R. Adrian, F. S. Simanjuntak, and K. Yudha, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Mahasiswa Penerima Bantuan UKT Dengan Menerapkan Metode ROC dan MAUT,†pp. 15–21, 2021.

J. S. Komputer, J. D. Rajagukguk, B. Purba, P. T. Informatika, and B. Darma, “Penerapan Kombinasi Metode ROC Dan MAUT Dalam Penentuan Calon Penerima Bantuan UKT Pada Universitas Budi Darma,†vol. 6, no. September, pp. 1193–1206, 2022.

D. H. Ramadan, M. R. Siregar, and S. R. Siregar, “Penerapan Metode MAUT Dalam Penentuan Kelayakan TKI dengan Pembobotan ROC,†J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1789–1795, 2022.

Z. M. Arini, D. J. Sitanggang, M. Ali, and S. Aripin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Facial Wash Terbaik yang digunakan pada kulit berminyak dengan menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory ( MAUT ) dan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid ( ROC ),†pp. 317–324, 2022.

F. Mahdi, Faisal, D. P. Indini, and Mesran, “Penerapan Metode WASPAS dan ROC ( Rank Order Centroid ) dalam Pengangkatan Karyawan Kontrak,†Bull. Comput. Sci. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 197–202, 2023, doi: 10.47065/bulletincsr.v3i2.232.

S. Hutagalung, D. S. Gea, D. P. Indini, and Mesran, “Penerapan Metode MOORA Dalam Pemilihan Bimbingan Belajar Terbaik,†J. Informatics Manag. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2023.

Mesran and D. P. Indini, “Analisis Dalam Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Content Creator Mahasiswa Terbaik Menerapkan Metode EDAS dan ROC,†J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 912–921, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v4i4.4093.

R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode MABAC dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Aplikasi Pemesanan Hotel Terbaik,†J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 191–201, 2022, doi: 10.47065/josh.v4i1.2415.

D. P. Indini, K. Khairunnisa, N. D. Puspa, T. A. Siregar, M. Mesran, and M. Kom, “Penerapan Metode OCRA dalam Menentukan Media Pembelajaran Online Terbaik di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 dengan Pembobotan ROC,†J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 60–66, 2021.

D. P. Indini and A. Triayudi, “Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Penentuan Alat Bantu Media Pembelajaran Fisika Terbaik Menggunakan Metode PSI,†vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 861–871, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v4i4.3466.

S. W. Pasaribu, D. P. Utomo, and Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Account Officer Menerapkan Metode EXPROM II ( Studi Kasus : Bank Sumut ),†J. Inf. Sist. Res., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 175–188, 2020.

L. Bidoux, J. P. Pignon, and F. Bénaben, “Planning with preferences using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory along with a Choquet Integral,†Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 85, no. August, pp. 808–817, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2019.08.002.

A. Perdana and A. Budiman, “Analysis of Multi-attribute Utility Theory for College Ranking Decision Making,†SinkrOn, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 19, 2020, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v4i2.10232.

J. Faran and R. T. Aldisa, “Implementasi Metode MAUT dengan Menerapkan Pembobotan ROC Dalam Pemilihan Ketua Himpunan Mahasiswa,†J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1315–1322, 2023.

D. N. Sholihaningtias, “Penerapan Kombinasi Metode MAUT dan ROC Dalam Seleksi Karyawan,†Techno. Com, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 145–155, 2023.

D. Aldo, N. Putra, and Z. Munir, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENILAIAN KINERJA DOSEN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE MULTI ATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY ( MAUT ) Dasril,†J. Sist. Inf. dan Manaj., vol. 7, no. 2, 2019.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v8i1.7049

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL MEDIA INFORMATIKA BUDIDARMA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


JURNAL MEDIA INFORMATIKA BUDIDARMA
Universitas Budi Darma
Secretariat: Sisingamangaraja No. 338 Telp 061-7875998
Email: mib.stmikbd@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.