Otoritas Guru Dalam Prestasi Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Fuzzy Mamdani
Abstract
Education is a systematic effort to create good learning conditions in increasing one's potential to have good knowledge, but in the teaching and learning process one often finds students who cannot achieve achievements in accordance with their intelligence and also the teacher's attitude in teaching and educating. The teaching and learning process is sometimes less effective, teachers tend to provide material using books and blackboards, thereby reducing students' interest in learning and affecting their learning achievement. Teachers have a huge influence on each student's development, but not all teachers are able to exercise their authority in the classroom. Teachers will be able to exercise their authority if they have good teaching skills. The use of fuzzy mamdani is able to calculate the extent of the teacher's authoritative relationship to student learning achievement based on the assessment data carried out. Based on the research results, the level of authority is divided into 3 membership functions (Bad, Fair, Good), from this data the highest value is 0.74 in the good membership function, 0.25 is sufficient and 0.00 is bad. So the category of the level of relationship between teacher authority and student learning achievement with a score of 84.95 is in the Good category. The value obtained from the calculation results can be a benchmark for the teacher's attitude and upbringing towards students.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
M. Makkawaru, “Pentingnya Pendidikan Bagi Kehidupan dan Pendidikan Karakter dalam Dunia Pendidikan,†J. Konsepsi, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 116–119, 2019, [Online]. Available: MaspaMakkawaru@gmail.com
S. Afniola, R. Ruslana, and W. Artika, “Intelegensi Dan Bakat Pada Prestasi Siswa,†Al-Din J. Dakwah dan Sos. Keagamaan, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.35673/ajdsk.v6i1.844.
M. N. Annisa, A. Wiliah, and N. Rahmawati, “Pentingnya Pendidikan Karakter Pada Anak Sekolah Dasar Di Zaman Serba Digital,†J. Pendidik. dan Sains, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 35–48, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/bintang
D. Desyanti, Y. Yusrizal, and F. Sari, “Implementasi Algoritma K-Modes Untuk Mengukur Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Pembelajaran Daring,†Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 719–727, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v3i4.1401.
Z. Nur, “Efektivitas Pembelajaran Pasca Pandemi covid-19 di MTs Negeri 1 Makassar,†Educandum, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 121–128, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.stkipalmaksum.ac.id/index.php/Sintaksis/article/view/183/183
Maryono, “Upaya Meningkatkan Pretasi Belajar Melalui Pemberian Tugas Awal dalam Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Indonesia,†J. Sos., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 127–140, 2022.
M. Riduan, “Peran Profesi Guru Dalam Pendidikan,†Seri Publ. Pembelajaran, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2021.
A. Syafi’i, T. Marfiyanto, and S. K. Rodiyah, “Studi Tentang Prestasi Belajar Siswa Dalam Berbagai Aspek Dan Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi,†J. Komun. Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 115, 2018, doi: 10.32585/jkp.v2i2.114.
A. M. Lailiyatul Maulidah, “Pendidikan Karakter Dalam Meraih Prestasi Belajar Prespektif Islam dan Psikologi,†TARBAWI J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 143–159, 2021.
I. Arafa and S. Supriyanto, “Strategi Guru dalam Pengelolaan Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa,†Inspirasi Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 2021.
R. D. K. S. Fatimah, “Strategi Belajar & Pembelajaran Dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Bahasa,†J. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 108–113, 2018, doi: 10.55606/jsr.v1i1.980.
D. M. Sandi and C. B. Nainggolan, “Cara Pandang Guru Kristen terhadap Otoritas dalam Kerangka Kisah Agung,†KENOSIS J. Kaji. Teol., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 180–198, 2020, doi: 10.37196/kenosis.v6i2.95.
H. Hartono, “Sumber Otoritas Pelaksanaan Supervisi Pendidikan,†Action Res. Lit., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.46799/arl.v5i1.8.
I. Magdalena, A. A. Nashrullah, L. N. Rahmayani, & Sri, and W. Pamungkas, “Intelegensi Anak Dan Usaha Serta Strategi Mengembangkan Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar Negeri Cireundeu 2,†PENSA J. Pendidik. dan Ilmu Sos., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 363–375, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/pensa
S. Triwulandari and S. U.S, “Analisis Inteligensi Dan Berpikir Kritis,†utile J. Kependidikan, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 50–61, 2022, doi: 10.37150/jut.v8i1.1618.
U. M. Rifanti, H. Pujiharsono, and Z. H. Pradana, “Implementasi Logika Fuzzy Pada Penilaian Kegiatan Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM),†JST (Jurnal Sains dan Teknol., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 250–260, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jstundiksha.v12i1.50057.
A. K. Nisa, M. Abdy, and A. Zaki, “Penerapan Fuzzy Logic untuk Menentukan Minuman Susu Kemasan Terbaik dalam Pengoptimalan Gizi,†J. Math. Comput. Stat., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 51, 2020, doi: 10.35580/jmathcos.v3i1.19902.
B. Davvaz, I. Mukhlash, and S. Soleha, “Himpunan Fuzzy dan Rough Sets,†Limits J. Math. Its Appl., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 79, 2021, doi: 10.12962/limits.v18i1.7705.
B. Lazuardi and S. Y. J. Prasetyo, “Model Sistem Pakar Fuzzy Logic Method untuk Menentukan Status Akreditasi pada Sistem Informasi SAPTI Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Berbasis Web,†Indones. J. Comput. Model., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 61–71, 2018, doi: 10.24246/j.icm.2018.v1.i2.p61-71.
L. P. Ayuningtias, M. Irfan, and J. Jumadi, “Analisa Perbandingan Logic Fuzzy Metode Tsukamoto, Sugeno, Dan Mamdani,†J. Tek. Inform., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2019.
P. Muntahanah and S. Handayani, “Penerapan Metode Fuzzy Mamdani Strategi Belajar Siswa Pada Persiapan Ujian Nasional Berbasis Komputer,†J. Pseudocode, vol. 2, no. September, 2021, [Online]. Available: www.ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/pseudocode
D. Vinensia, “Penentuan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Aplikasi Fuzzy Mamdani ( STUDY KASUS: SMK NEGERI 1 SERDANG BEDAGAI ),†Publ. J. Penelit. Tek. Inform., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 58–70, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://prosiding.unipma.ac.id/index.php/SENATIK/article/view/1073
F. Rastic Andrari, M. Maimunah, and Nurmala Dewi Qadarsih, “Penerapan Metode Fuzzy Mamdani Dalam Menentukan Harga Jual Ponsel Pintar Bekas (Studi Kasus Pada Kayyis Cellular Depok),†Pixel J. Ilm. Komput. Graf., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 253–262, 2021, doi: 10.51903/pixel.v14i2.585.
K. Y. Agung Setiawan, Budi Yanto, Logika Fuzzy dengan MATLAB (Contoh Kasus Penelitian dengan Fuzzy Tsukomoto), 1st ed. Denpasar Bali: Jayapangus Press, 2018.
P. Susanti and S. M. Bahri, “Penerapan Fuzzy Mamdani Dalam Pemilihan Murid Teladan Pada Sekolah Paud Harmony Kotawaringin Timur,†J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 178–186, 2021.
D. L. Rahakbauw, F. J. Rianekuay, Y. A. Lesnussa, and J. Matematika, “PENERAPAN METODE FUZZY MAMDANI UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI JUMLAH PRODUKSI KARET (STUDI KASUS: DATA PERSEDIAAN DAN PERMINTAAN PRODUKSI KARET PADA PTP NUSANTARA XIV (PERSERO) KEBUN AWAYA, TELUK ELPAPUTIH, MALUKU-INDONESIA),†J. Ilm. Mat. dan Terap., vol. 16, no. 01, pp. 119–127, 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v7i3.6368
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL MEDIA INFORMATIKA BUDIDARMA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
JURNAL MEDIA INFORMATIKA BUDIDARMA
Universitas Budi Darma
Secretariat: Sisingamangaraja No. 338 Telp 061-7875998
Email: mib.stmikbd@gmail.com
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.