Komparasi Evaluasi Kinerja Siswa Belajar dengan Mengggunakan Algoritma Machine Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v6i4.4786Keywords:
Comparation, Neural Network, Evaluation, Performance, Machine LearningAbstract
In our current study, we are doing a comparison of several algorithms that we have tested, namely in searching for the accuracy level of learning performance in students, the problem of this research is how to get the results of excellent generalization abilities so that a higher accuracy value is obtained. Our goal is to get the best-performing accuracy level results and then to identify features that can affect student learning performance. From the results of the algorithm that we have tested, four of them are Naïve Bayes, Support Vectore Machine, Neural Network and KNN contained in machine learning. The results of the four algorithms for the Naïve Bayes algorithm have an accuracy value of 96.30%, the Support Vectore Machine algorithm has an accuracy of 98.70%, and the Naural Network algorithm has an accuracy of 99.50% and the last one with the KNN algorithm produces an accuracy of 94.80%. it can be concluded that using the Neural Network algorithm is an algorithm with the best performance than using other algorithms in evaluating student learning performance, besides that the Neural Network can be used as an excellent alternative to be used as predictions, especially in the field of education.References
S. F. Aziz, “Students’ Performance Evaluation Using Machine Learning Algorithms,†Univ. Al-hamdaniya, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 976–986, 2020.
N. Ketui, “Using Classification Data Mining Techniques for Students Performance Prediction,†2020 Jt. Int. Conf. Digit. Arts, Media Technol. with ECTI North. Sect. Conf. Electr. Electron. Comput. Telecommun. Eng. ECTI DAMT NCON 2020, pp. 359–363, 2020.
A. Tousi and M. Lujan, “Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Performance Prediction of the SPEC Benchmarks,†IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 11994–12011, 2022.
Z. A. Adriani and I. Palupi, “Prediction of University Student Performance Based on Tracer Study Dataset Using Artificial Neural Network,†J. Komtika (Komputasi dan Inform., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 72–82, 2021.
P. M. Arsad, N. Buniyamin, and J. L. A. Manan, “A neural network students’ performance prediction model (NNSPPM),†2013 IEEE Int. Conf. Smart Instrumentation, Meas. Appl. ICSIMA 2013, no. November, 2013.
E. P. Saputra, Supriatiningsih, Indriyanti, and Sugiono, “Prediction of Evaluation Result of E-learning Success Based on Student Activity Logs with Selection of Neural Network Attributes Base on PSO,†J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1641, no. 1, 2020.
Y. A. Alsariera, Y. Baashar, G. Alkawsi, A. Mustafa, A. A. Alkahtani, and N. Ali, “Assessment and Evaluation of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Student Performance,†Comput. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 2022, pp. 1–11, 2022.
M. Zafari, A. Sadeghi-Niaraki, S. M. Choi, and A. Esmaeily, “A practical model for the evaluation of high school student performance based on machine learning,†Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 23, 2021.
S. Ghareeb et al., “Evaluating student levelling based on machine learning model’s performance,†Discov. Internet Things, vol. 2, no. 1, 2022.
E. S. Panca Saputra and Indriyanti, “Comparison of Data Mining In E-Learning Learning Based On Log Aktivity On PSO-Based Nural Network Algorithms With PSO-Based SVM,†Indones. J. Artif. Intell. Data Min., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 95–102, 2020.
I. Technologies, “Predicting student final performance using artificial neural networks in online learning environments,†Educ. Inf. Technol., 2019.
F. Handayani and S. Pribadi, “Implementasi Algoritma Naive Bayes Classifier dalam Pengklasifikasian Teks Otomatis Pengaduan dan Pelaporan Masyarakat melalui Layanan Call Center 110,†J. Tek. Elektro, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 19–24, 2015.
F. Janan and S. K. Ghosh, “Prediction of student’s performance using support vector machine classifier,†Proc. Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Oper. Manag., pp. 7078–7088, 2021.
V. V. Corinna Cortes, “Support-Vector Networks,†IEEE Expert. Syst. their Appl., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 63–72, 1995.
C. F. RodrÃguez-Hernández, M. Musso, E. Kyndt, and E. Cascallar, “Artificial neural networks in academic performance prediction: Systematic implementation and predictor evaluation,†Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 2, no. March, 2021.
G. S. and V. G. Gupta N., Khosravy M., Patel N., Artificial Neural Network Trained by Plant Ge- netic-Inspired Optimizer, Frontier Applications of Nature Inspired Computation, Frontier A. 2020.
Y. F. Safri, R. Arifudin, and M. A. Muslim, “K-Nearest Neighbor and Naive Bayes Classifier Algorithm in Determining The Classification of Healthy Card Indonesia Giving to The Poor,†Sci. J. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 18, 2018.
A. Nugroho, O. R. Riady, A. Calvin, and D. Suhartono, “Identification of Student Academic Performance using the KNN Algorithm,†Eng. Math. Comput. Sci. J., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 115–122, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
