Analisis Perbandingan Metode AHP dan Metode MFEP Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v6i4.4634Keywords:
Decision Support System, Vendor, AHP, MFEPAbstract
Vendor is a party in the form of a company that provides goods and services to consumers or other business actors. Pasar Minggu Regional General Hospital is one of the Class B Non-Educational General Hospitals located in the heart of South Jakarta. The selection of vendors at Pasar Minggu Hospital was previously still using the traditional system and had not used it. The traditional method used previously often had several problems, starting from the administration of vendor data that was not accurate, as well as writing vendor data that was always wrong, then there was negligence in vendor assessment, and up to vendor selection that was not in accordance with the right mechanism. From these problems, Pasar Minggu Hospital requires a Decision Support System application in searching for vendors to be selected for a project. Because of this, Pasar Minggu Hospital plans to make a Decision Support System application to carry out the process of selecting the best vendor and in accordance with the criteria determined by the management of Pasar Minggu Hospital. The criteria between vendors include C1 (Finance), C2 (Performance), C3 (Safety) and C4 (Quality). On the Decision Support System website there are 5 menus, namely Company Data, Data Criteria, Criteria Comparison, Assessment Data and Analysis Results. In the calculation using the appropriate AHP consistency ratio of 0.10, it means that the data is declared consistent. And in the MFEP method the total Factor Weight is 9.00 with details of Finance 2.00, work safety 2.00, quality 3.00 and performance 2.00. From the calculation results of the two methods above that the first order of comparison of vendor results is occupied by PT. Bangun Rezeki with a percentage using AHP of 87%, and using MFEP of 71%, in second position by PT. Building Award with a percentage of 81% and 73% with MFEP. And the last position by PT. Ocean figures with a percentage of 72% using AHP and 56% using MFEP.References
“Apa itu Vendor? Definisi, Tanggung Jawab, Cara Kerja, dan Jenisnya.†https://blog.skillacademy.com/vendor-adalah (accessed Aug. 11, 2022).
“TENTANG KAMI – RSUD Pasar Minggu.†https://rsudpasarminggu.jakarta.go.id/tentang-kami/ (accessed Aug. 11, 2022).
“Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode & Implementasi - Tonni Limbong, Muttaqin Muttaqin, Akbar Iskandar, Agus Perdana Windarto, Janner Simarmata, Mesran Mesran, Oris Krianto Sulaiman, Dodi Siregar, Dicky Nofriansyah, Darmawan Napitupulu, Anjar Wanto - Google Buku.†https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=6FnYDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Sistem+Pendukung+Keputusan&ots=XeNUbxOLmJ&sig=ZqZr3ZS7ivs1fQ9NRLVM4vVkbA0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Sistem Pendukung Keputusan&f=false (accessed Aug. 11, 2022).
M. Iqbal, A. Triayudi, and B. Rahman, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Promosi Jabatan Dengan Perbandingan Metode AHP dan MFEP,†J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 768–776, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.30865/MIB.V6I2.3550.
“Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Teknik Penentuan Strategi Daya Saing Ker... - Google Books.†https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Analytical_Hierarchy_Process_AHP_Teknik/WIOYDwAAQBAJ?hl=id&gbpv=1&dq=AHP&printsec=frontcover (accessed Aug. 11, 2022).
A. Apriyaningsih, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor Project Menerapkan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),†TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 542–550, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.47065/TIN.V2I9.1309.
“Buku Ajar: Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Teori dan Implementasi - Google Books.†https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Buku_Ajar_Sistem_Pendukung_Keputusan_Teo/TeBjDwAAQBAJ?hl=id&gbpv=1&dq=SPK+MFEP&printsec=frontcover (accessed Aug. 11, 2022).
M. Sauqie, I. Budiawan, and U. Nusamandiri, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor Telekomunikasi Pada PT. Indosat Menggunakan Metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process (AHP),†J. Infortech, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 157–163, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.31294/INFORTECH.V3I2.11788.
R. Hardianto et al., “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Pemenang Vendor Kontraktor Menggunakan Metode AHP (Studi Kasus Di Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Kabupaten Agam),†INOVTEK Polbeng - Seri Inform., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 169–176, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.35314/ISI.V1I2.136.
I. Kurnia and A. Muhtarom, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN UNTUK MENENTUKAN SISWA TERBAIK MENGGUNAKAN PERBANDINGAN METODE AHP DAN SAW,†J. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 164–172, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.33387/JIKO.V4I3.3339.
S. Saripah and A. Abdullah, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN CALON PEMENANG VENDOR PROYEK DENGAN METODE ANALITYC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN INDRAGIRI HILIR,†Sist. J. Sist. Inf., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 54–59, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.32520/STMSI.V4I3.153.
M. Hadi, “Sistem penyeleksian kontraktor untuk sebuah proyek menggunakan logika Multi-Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP),†Jun. 2020.
M. S. D. Putra, S. Andryana, Fauziah, and A. Gunaryati, “Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process method to determine the quality of gemstones,†Adv. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 2018, 2018, doi: 10.1155/2018/9094380.
C. C. Chou and K. W. Yu, “Application of a new hybrid fuzzy AHP model to the location choice,†Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2013, 2013, doi: 10.1155/2013/592138.
S. Destari and B. K. Simpony, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Wedding Organizer Menggunakan Metode AHP,†IJCIT (Indonesian J. Comput. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.31294/IJCIT.V3I2.4665.
F. Annas, D. Ediana, A. Kurniawan, R. Wandira, and S. Zakir, “Decision Support System in Detrmination of Project Vendor Winner Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method,†J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1779, no. 1, p. 012006, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1779/1/012006.
A. R., “Web GIS Penentuan Potensi Usaha Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Peocess (AHP).†2014.
B. Sudarman, “Pengembangan Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemenang Vendor Proyek Pada Pt . Sabila Inti,†2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
