Analisis Tingkat Kematangan Smart City Kabupaten Lombok Utara Menggunakan COBIT 2019

Authors

  • Ari Panen Haster Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga
  • Kristoko Dwi Hartomo Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v6i3.4344

Keywords:

Smart City, COBIT 2019, Capability Level, North Lombok Regency, Domain Process

Abstract

Indonesia's national smart city program adopts 6 main dimensions of smart cities, namely Governance, Branding, Economy, Living, Society, and Environment. The North Lombok Regency Government also developed the regional smart city concept in 2021 which is stated in the 2021-2026 RPJMD. The results of capability level research on smart city dimensions and process domains show that there are 3 dimensions that are still far from the expected target, namely Smart Branding, Smart Economy and Smart Environment, and there are 3 dimensions that are close to the achievement target, namely Smart Governance, Smart Living, and Smart Society. While the analysis of the 9 COBIT 2019 process domains shows that there are 3 process domains that have not been managed, namely: APO03, APO12 dan DSS04, 4 process domains have been defined and are running well, namely: APO07, APO12, APO14, and BAI01, and 3 process domains that have been managed and have achieved the expected targets, namely: APO07, APO14, and BAI01. The average GAP value of the analysis of smart city dimensions and COBIT 2019 process domains is 1.7 and 1.3, respectively.

References

K. Wabang, Y. Rahma, A. P. Widodo, and ..., “Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Cobit 2019 Pada Psi Universitas Muria Kudus,†… (Jurnal Teknol. dan …, vol. VII, no. 3, pp. 275–282, 2021.

H. Lokantara, I Gede Wayana., Muwakhid, Indra Abdam., Mustofa, “Strategi Dan Usulan Perencanaan Smart City Kabupaten Kendal,†Plano Madan, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 126–137, 2019.

S. Šurdonja, T. Giuffrè, and A. Deluka-Tibljaš, “Smart mobility solutions-necessary precondition for a well-functioning smart city,†Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 45, no. 2019, pp. 604–611, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.051.

M. Murhadi and H. M. Jumasa, “Strategi Transisi Kabupaten Purworejo dari E-Government menuju Smart City,†J. Sist. Cerdas, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 186–193, 2019, doi: 10.37396/jsc.v2i3.41.

S. Bahri, K. Effendy, Ngadisah, and S. Lukman, “Implementasi Kebijakan Smart City Dalam Mewujudkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Di Kota Tangerang,†PAPATUNG J. Ilmu Adm. Publik, Pemerintah. dan Polit., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 61–75, 2020, doi: 10.54783/japp.v3i3.316.

R. Mahesa, G. Yudoko, and Y. Anggoro, “Dataset on the sustainable smart city development in Indonesia,†Data Br., vol. 25, p. 104098, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104098.

S. H. Supangkat, A. A. Arman, R. A. Nugraha, and Y. A. Fatimah, “The Implementation of Garuda Smart City Framework for Smart City Readiness Mapping in Indonesia,†J. Asia-Pacific Stud., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 169–176, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/159504667.pdf

D. N. Utami and U. Andalas, “Memahami Makna Dan Motif Masyarakat Kota Pariaman Dalam Mendukung Pariaman Smart City Understanding the Meaning and Motives of the People of Pariaman City in Supporting Pariaman Smart City,†vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021.

A. Hasibuan and oris krianto Sulaiman, “Smart City, Konsep Kota Cerdas Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Masalah Perkotaan Kabupaten/Kota,†Bul. Tek., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 127–135, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/but/article/view/1097

B. E. Bitjoli et al., “Analisa Kesiapan Kota Cerdas (Studi Kasus: Pemerintah Kota Manado),†J. Tek. Inform., vol. 12, no. 1, 2017.

A. Safitri, I. Syafii, and K. Adi, “Identifikasi Level Pengelolaan Tata Kelola SIPERUMKIM Kota Salatiga berdasarkan COBIT 2019,†J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 429–438, 2021, doi: 10.29207/resti.v5i3.3060.

E. Nachrowi, Yani Nurhadryani, and Heru Sukoco, “Evaluation of Governance and Management of Information Technology Services Using Cobit 2019 and ITIL 4,†J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 764–774, 2020, doi: 10.29207/resti.v4i4.2265.

D. A. N. Reformasi and B. Republik, “BERITA NEGARA,†no. 994, 2020.

Perpres, “Perpres 95/2018 - SPBE,†vol. 1, pp. 1–32, 2018.

H. Y. Efenie, “Analisis Kesiapan Pemerintah Kabupaten Pamekasan Dalam Membangun Kotacerdas (Smart City) Menggunakan Garuda Smart …,†Teknokom, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 17–23, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/339440-kajian-simulasi-model-biswas-sen-dalam-d-a818d6aa.pdf

I. Ulya A. and A. Tarigan, “Mengukur Kesiapan Kota Dalam Menerapkan Konsep Smart City Inisiatif (Studi Kasus: Kota Banjarmasin),†J. Speed – Sentra Penelit. Eng. dan Edukasi, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 50–56, 2017.

S. De Haes and W. Van Grembergen, COBIT as a Framework for Enterprise Governance of IT, no. March 2021. 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-14547-1_5.

ISACA Governance and Manajement, COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives (ISACA). 2019.

A. Mualo and A. D. Budiyanto, “Perencanaan Strategis Sistem Informasi Menggunakan Togaf (Studi Kasus : Universitas Satria Makassar),†Semin. Ris. Teknol. Inf. tahun 2016, pp. 294–304, 2016.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-25

Issue

Section

Articles