Analisis Usability pada Situs Perpustakaan UC dengan Menggunakan System Usability Scale

Authors

  • Indra Maryati Universitas Ciputra Surabaya, Surabaya
  • Elisabeth Inez Nugroho Universitas Ciputra Surabaya, Surabaya
  • Zefanya Oktaviana Indrasanti Universitas Ciputra Surabaya, Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v6i1.3472

Keywords:

Usability, SUS, Website, Revitalization, User Evaluation,

Abstract

During the Covid-19 pandemic, libraries have been severely impacted by a decline in visitors. Universitas Ciputra’s Library (UC Library) has its own website outside the main university website, but the initial page does not reflect much on the main function of the library which provides collections that are available and accessible to users. To revive the function of the UC Library site to be useful and empowered for the UC academic community, it is necessary to revitalize it. The level of usability is very influential for the sustainability of a system, and in this study it can certainly be useful for initial data on the revitalization process. One method to measure usability that is often used is the System Usability Scale (SUS). SUS was developed by John Brooke since 1986. SUS is a usability scale that is reliable, popular, effective, and inexpensive. Users of the UC Library site were given 10 questions and answered them using a Likert scale. The results of the calculation of 46 respondents obtained the SUS score obtained is 57.12. This value falls into category F, and this results in a low usability level of the UC Library site and it is very necessary to revitalize it.

References

J. Brooke, “SUS: a ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale,†Usability Eval. Ind., vol. 189, no. 194, pp. 4–7, 1996.

Hilda Rachmi and Siti Nurwahyuni, “Pengujian Usability Lokamedia Website Menggunakan System Usability Scale,†Al-Khidmah, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 86–92, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.29406/al-khidmah.v1i2.1155.

W. Welda, D. M. D. U. Putra, and A. M. Dirgayusari, “Usability Testing Website Dengan Menggunakan Metode System Usability Scale (Sus)s,†Int. J. Nat. Sci. Eng., vol. 4, no. 3, p. 152, 2020, doi: 10.23887/ijnse.v4i2.28864.

Z. Miftah and I. P. Sari, “Analisis Sistem Pembelajaran Daring Menggunakan Metode Sus,†Res. Dev. J. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 40, 2020, doi: 10.30998/rdje.v1i1.7076.

W. Handiwidjojo and L. Ernawati, “Pengukuran Tingkat Ketergunaan ( Usability ) Sistem Informasi Keuangan Studi Kasus : Duta Wacana Internal Transaction ( Duwit ),†J. Inform. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 02, no. 01, pp. 49–55, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://journal.uc.ac.id/index.php/JUISI/article/view/115.

I. A. H.N, P. I. Nugroho, and R. Ferdiana, “Pengujian Usability Website Menggunakan System Usability Scale,†J. IPTEKKOM J. Ilmu Pengetah. Teknol. Inf., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 31, 2015, doi: 10.33164/iptekkom.17.1.2015.31-38.

B. Klug, “An Overview of the System Usability Scale in Library Website and System Usability Testing,†Weav. J. Libr. User Exp., vol. 1, no. 6, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.3998/weave.12535642.0001.602.

J. Brooke, “SUS : A Retrospective,†J. Usability Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 29–40, 2013.

J. Sauro, “Measuring Usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS),†MeasuringU.com, 2011. https://measuringu.com/sus/ (accessed Sep. 15, 2021).

S. Peres, T. Pham, and R. Phillips, “Validation of the System Usability Scale (SUS),†Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet., vol. 57, pp. 192–196, 2013, doi: 10.1177/1541931213571043.

P. S. C., “The effect of experience on System Usability Scale ratings,†J. Usability Stud., vol. 7, p. 56, 2012.

J. R. Lewis and J. Sauro, “Item Benchmarks for the System Usability Scale,†J. Usability Stud., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 158–167, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://uxpajournal.org/item-benchmarks-system-usability-scale-sus/.

N. L. P. R. Indriyani, G. R. Dantes, and K. Y. E. Aryanto, “Analisis Kebermanfaatan Website Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata (Stipar) Triatma Jaya Menggunakan Metode Usability Testing,†Int. J. Nat. Sci. Eng., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 56, 2017, doi: 10.23887/ijnse.v1i2.12469.

J. R. Lewis and J. Sauro, “The Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale,†in Human Centered Design, First International Conference, HCD 2009, Held as Part of HCI International 2009, San Diego, CA, USA, 2009, pp. 94–103.

A. Bangor, T. Staff, P. Kortum, J. Miller, and T. Staff, “Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale,†J. usability Stud., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 114–123, 2009.

J. Sauro and J. R. Lewis, Quantifying the user experience: practical statistics for user research. Amsterdam: Waltham, MA: Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann, 2016.

“GTmetrix.†https://gtmetrix.com (accessed Dec. 01, 2021).

Downloads

Published

2022-01-25

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): Januari 2022

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).