Model Pengetahuan Berbasis Ontologi pada Domain Big Data di Perguruan Tinggi

Authors

  • Yunizar Fahmi Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta
  • Dhomas Hatta Fudholi Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v6i1.3424

Keywords:

Ontology, Big Data Analytics, Higher Education

Abstract

The big data phenomenon is also having an impact on the higher education sector. The readiness of education sector is non-negotiable for the face of the big data era so that organizations are able to adapt. Thus, knowledge to utilize big data needs to be owned by higher education institutions in order to innovate. Basically, there are quite a lot of studies that produce models as knowledge to take advantage of big data. However, reviewing the research that has been done previously, it is also necessary to conduct research that discusses the development of models to represent knowledge about big data analytics in higher education institutions. Knowledge that has been represented as a knowledge model can then be interpreted and stored as a knowledge base in a knowledge management system so that knowledge can be managed and utilized better. Based on these problems, ontology can be used to model knowledge. This research will develop an ontology-based knowledge model related to the use of big data in the education sector, especially higher education based on the concepts of analytics, data sources, and platforms. The ontology modeling process in this study is divided into 3 (three) phases: 1) Conceptualization; 2) Implementation; and 3) Evaluation. Based on the evaluation results of ontology measurements using schema metrics, the RR (Relationship Richness) value is 0.62, meaning that the ontology model contains a variety of information; the IR (Inheritance Richness) value is 1.78, meaning that the ontology model belongs to a fairly specific category, and the AR (Attribute Richness) value is 0.06, meaning that the information contained can be improved further. Based on the results of the query test analysis, the ontology is considered capable of retrieving the knowledge stored in it accurately based on validation that adjusts the query results with the ontology.

References

I. Lee, “Big data: Dimensions, evolution, impacts, and challenges,†Business Horizons, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 293–303, May 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2017.01.004.

E. Kurilovas, “On data-driven decision-making for quality education,†Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 107, p. 105774, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.CHB.2018.11.003.

M. K. Saggi and S. Jain, “A survey towards an integration of big data analytics to big insights for value-creation,†Information Processing & Management, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 758–790, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.IPM.2018.01.010.

H. Waheed, S. U. Hassan, N. R. Aljohani, J. Hardman, S. Alelyani, and R. Nawaz, “Predicting academic performance of students from VLE big data using deep learning models,†Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 104, p. 106189, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.CHB.2019.106189.

M. de Silva, J. Howells, and M. Meyer, “Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation,†Research Policy, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 70–87, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.RESPOL.2017.09.011.

I. Rozas, Khalid, D. Rolliawati, N. Wahyudi, and M. Ratodi, “Readiness of Indonesian Higher Education Programs in the Big Data Era,†in Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Nov. 2019, pp. 1216–1221. doi: 10.2991/ICSS-19.2019.1.

M. Attaran, J. Stark, and D. Stotler, “Opportunities and challenges for big data analytics in US higher education: A conceptual model for implementation,†Industry and Higher Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 169–182, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0950422218770937.

S. Seufert, C. Meier, M. Soellner, and R. Rietsche, “A Pedagogical Perspective on Big Data and Learning Analytics: A Conceptual Model for Digital Learning Support,†Technology, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 599–619, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1007/S10758-019-09399-5.

M. A. Ashaari, A. Amran, N. H. Ahmad, H. Bakri, and S. Nazri, “Big Data Analytics Technology Capability and Data-Driven Decision Making in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions: A Conceptual Framework,†in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Jun. 2020, vol. 874, no. 1, pp. 12–21. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/874/1/012021.

N. A. Alsheikh, “Developing an Integrated Framework to Utilize Big Data for Higher Education Institutions in Saudi Arabia,†International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology (IJCSIT) , vol. 11, 2019.

W. Yun, X. Zhang, Z. Li, H. Liu, and M. Han, “Knowledge modeling: A survey of processes and techniques,†International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1686–1720, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1002/INT.22357.

D. H. Fudholi, W. Rahayu, and E. Pardede, “A data-driven dynamic ontology,†Journal of Information Science, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 383–398, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1177/0165551515576478.

Y. F. Badron, F. Agus, and H. R. Hatta, “Studi Tentang Pemodelan Ontologi Web Semantik Dan Prospek Penerapan Pada Bibliografi Artikel Jurnal Ilmiah,†in SAKTI (Seminar Ilmu Komputer dan Teknologi Informasi), Mar. 2017, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 164–169.

N. F. Noy and D. L. Mcguinness, “Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology,†2001.

DAMA International, DAMA-DMBOK: Data management body of knowledge. 2017.

S. Sakr and A. Y. Zomaya, Encyclopedia of Big Data Technologies. Springer International Publishing, 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-77525-8.

X. Bai et al., “Educational Big Data: Predictions, Applications and Challenges,†Big Data Research, vol. 26, p. 100270, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.BDR.2021.100270.

K. L. M. Ang, F. L. Ge, and K. P. Seng, “Big Educational Data Analytics: Survey, Architecture and Challenges,†IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 116392–116414, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2994561.

M. I. Baig, L. Shuib, and E. Yadegaridehkordi, “Big data in education: a state of the art, limitations, and future research directions,†International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–23, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/S41239-020-00223-0/TABLES/11.

A. Mohamed, M. K. Najafabadi, Y. B. Wah, E. A. K. Zaman, and R. Maskat, “The state of the art and taxonomy of big data analytics: view from new big data framework,†Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 989–1037, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1007/S10462-019-09685-9/TABLES/4.

H. Aldowah, H. Al-Samarraie, and W. M. Fauzy, “Educational data mining and learning analytics for 21st century higher education: A review and synthesis,†Telematics and Informatics, vol. 37, pp. 13–49, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.TELE.2019.01.007.

J. A. Marín-Marín, J. López-Belmonte, J. M. Fernández-Campoy, and J. M. Romero-Rodríguez, “Big Data in Education. A Bibliometric Review,†Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 8, p. 223, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.3390/SOCSCI8080223.

S. Tartir and I. B. Arpinar, “Ontology evaluation and ranking using OntoQA,†in International Conference on Semantic Computing, 2007, pp. 185–192. doi: 10.1109/ICSC.2007.19.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-25

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): Januari 2022

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).