SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN PERUMAHAN DENGAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING (SAW)

Authors

  • Hartika Manao STMIK Budi Darma Jln. Sisingamangaraja No. 338 Medan
  • Berto Nadeak STMIK Budi Darma Jln. Sisingamangaraja No. 338 Medan
  • Taronisokhi Zebua AMIK STIEKOM Sumatera Utara Jl. Abdul Haris Nasution No. 19 Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v1i2.327

Abstract

Housing is a basic human need and needs to be nurtured and developed for the sake of the continuity and improvement of people's lives and settlements that can not be seen as a means of necessity solely, but more than that is the process of human settlements in creating a space of life to socialize themselves in expressing their identity. During this time customers make housing selection based on information from others, observing housing and experience by not considering the criteria needed so often cause new problems for the customer after buying housing. Problems such as inconvenience, credit installment problems and so forth. Decision support systems are generally defined as a system capable of producing solutions and problem- solving. Decision support systems are not intended to replace decision-making roles, but to assist and support decision makers. One of the most commonly used methods in decision support systems is the simple additive weighting (SAW) method. This simple additive weighting method can determine the preference value of each alternative, then perform the warfare process that can select the best alternative from a number of alternatives available.

References

S. Amin, Free Properti Dalam 17 Hari. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2010.

K. Safitri, F. T. Waruwu, and M. Mesran, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN KARYAWAN BERPRESTASI DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIEARARCHY PROCESS (Studi Kasus : PT.Capella Dinamik Nusantara Takengon),†MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 1, no. 1, Feb. 2017.

Mesran, G. Ginting, Suginam, and R. Rahim, “Implementation of Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality ( ELECTRE ) Method in Selecting the Best Lecturer ( Case Study STMIK BUDI DARMA ),†Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. (IJERT, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 141–144, 2017.

Kusumadewi, Multi-Attribute Decision. 2006.

M. Iswan, W. Fitriani, N. Mayasari, and A. P. U. Siahaan, “Tuition Reduction Determination Using Fuzzy Tsukamoto,†Int. J. Eng. Sci. Invent., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 68–72, 2016.

S. Dewi, Wardoyo, Hartati, and Harjono, Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM). Jakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2009.

Kusrini, Konsep dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2007.

Risawandi and R. Rahim, “Study of the Simple Multi- Attribute Rating Technique For Decision Support,†IJSRST, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 491–494, 2016.

Y. Zai, M. Mesran, B. Nadeak, and I. Saputra, “PENERAPAN TECHNIQUE FOR ORDERS PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY TO IDEAL SOLUTION (TOPSIS) UNTUK KEPUTUSAN PEMBERIAN KREDIT PADA CALON NASABAH (Studi Kasus : PT. SS Finance),†MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 1, no. 1, Feb. 2017.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-17

Issue

Section

Articles