Pengujian Validitas dan Reliabilitas Model UTAUT 2 dan EUCS Pada Sistem Informasi Akademik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v5i3.3074Keywords:
Validity, Reliability, SmartPLS, UTAUT 2, EUCS, Academic Information SystemAbstract
The research instrument is used to collect data or measure the object of a study. The purpose of this study was to determine which instruments were declared valid and reliable and to find out the variables with the highest validity and reliability values. Validity testing is carried out to determine the effectiveness of an instrument, while reliability testing is carried out to show the level of reliability of the indicators used. Testing the validity and reliability using software SmartPLS version 3.3.2 with a measurement scale that is Likert scale. Validity testing is done by looking at the average variance extracted (AVE) value and the comparison of the latent variable correlations values, while reliability testing is done by looking at the composite reliability value. The population in this study were active students at the State Islamic University (UIN) Raden Fatah Palembang, totaling 19,260 students with the determination of the sample using the Slovin formula with a level of significance = 5%. Data collection in this study was carried out by distributing online questionnaires. The questionnaire was made based on indicators on the model used, where the models used were UTAUT 2 and EUCS. The UTAUT 2 model can be used to measure the level of user acceptance of the system consisting of the variables of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, hedonic motivation, perceived value, habit, and behavioral intention. Furthermore, the EUCS model is used to measure the level of user satisfaction which consists of content, accuracy, format, ease of use, timeliness, and user satisfaction variables. The results of the validity and reliability testing state that all indicators are valid and reliable with an AVE value > 0.50 in the validity test and the composite reliability value > 0.70 in the reliability test. The validity test with the highest value is found in the ease of use variable with an AVE value of 0.826 and reliability testing with the highest value is found in the performance expectancy variable with a composite reliability value of 0.924. With this research, it is expected to obtain variables in the model to evaluate user acceptance and satisfaction with academic information systemsReferences
A. S. Ahmar, Panduan Sistem Informasi Akademik Sekolah Berbasi Web, Cetakan 1., no. May. Sulawasi Selatan: Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia, 2019.
A. W. Doni, “Evaluasi SDM Sistem Informasi Akademik Poltekkes Kemenkes Padang Menggunakan Framework COBIT 5,†J. Resti, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 146–152, 2017.
A. Jameel, A. Nawaiseh, Y. Helmy, and E. Khalil, “A New Software Quality Model For Academic Information Systems " Case Study E-Learning System ",†vol. 9, no. 01, 2020.
R. Realize, “Analysis of Trust through Academic Information System and Image of Private University,†Arch. Bus. Res., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 252–259, 2018, doi: 10.14738/abr.66.3565.
C. Dewi et al., “Penerapan Model UTAUT Untuk Pemahaman Sistem Informasi Akademik di Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya,†Semin. Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun. 2018 (SENTIKA 2018), pp. 23–24, 2018.
D. Hadiansyah and T. Dirgahayu, “Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Akademik Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta Menggunakan UTAUT2,†J. Multimed. Artif. Intell., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2020.
S. Sutanto, I. Ghozali, and R. S. Handayani, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Penerimaan Dan Penggunaan Sistem Informasi Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah (SIPKD) Dalam Perspektif the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT 2) Di Kabupaten Semarang,†J. Akunt. Dan Audit., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 37–68, 2018, doi: 10.14710/jaa.15.1.37-68.
A. S. Damayanti, Y. T. Musityo, and A. D. Herlambang, “Evaluasi Kepuasan Pengguna Aplikasi Tapp Market Menggunakan Metode EUCS (End User Computing Satisfaction),†J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 4833–4839, 2018.
E. Sorongan, H. Hilmansyah, and H. Hadiyanto, “Pengaruh Variabel Kualitas Sistem Informasi Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Sistem Informasi Model EUCS,†J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 2019, doi: 10.29207/resti.v3i1.777.
E. Nur Sasongko, Mustafid, and A. Rusgiyono, “PENERAPAN METODE STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING UNTUK ANALISIS KEPUASAN PENGGUNA SISTEM INFORMASI AKADEMIK TERHADAP KUALITAS WEBSITE (Studi Kasus pada Website sia.undip.ac.id),†J. Gaussian, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 395–404, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/gaussian.
F. Yusup, “Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif,†J. Tarb. J. Ilm. Kependidikan, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2018, doi: 10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100.
M. B. Suryawan and Prihandoko, “Evaluasi Penerapan SIAKAD Politeknik Negeri Madiun Menggunakan Pendekatan TAM dan EUCS,†Citec J., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 233–244, 2018.
H. Taherdoost, “Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research,†Int. J. Acad. Res. Manag., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 18–27, 2018, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3205035.
A. Hasibuan, Metodologi Penelitian: Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Sumatera Utara: Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, 2020.
Sugiyono, “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.†Alfabeta, Bandung, 2017.
V. H. Pranatawijaya, Widiatry, R. Priskila, and P. B. A. A. Putra, “Penerapan Skala Likert dan Skala Dikotomi Pada Kuesioner Online Pengembangan Aplikasi Kuesioner Survey Berbasis Web Menggunakan Skala Likert dan Guttman,†J. Sains dan Inform., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 128–137, 2019, doi: 10.34128/jsi.v5i2.185.
R. Hamid and S. Anwar, STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING (SEM) BERBASIS VARIAN : Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasi dengan Program SmartPLS 3.2.8 dalam Riset Bisnis, Cetakan 1. Jakarta Pusat: PT Inkubator Penulis Indonesia, 2019.
E. U. N. Sholiha and M. Salamah, “Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Square untuk Pemodelan derajat Kesehatan Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Timur (Studi Kasus Data Indeks Pembangunana Kesehatan Masyarakat Jawa Timur 2013),†J. Sains Dan Seni ITS, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 4–9, 2015.
V. Venkatesh, J. Y. L. Thong, and X. Xu, “Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology,†MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 157–178, 2012, doi: 10.2307/41410412.
M. S. Gayatrie, A. Kusyanti, and M. C. Saputra, “Analisis Penerimaan Os Windows 10 Dengan Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2),†Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 514–523, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id.
A. Anwar, “Analisis Penerimaaan Pemustaka Terhadap Institutional Repository Berbasis E-Prints di Perpustakaan Universitas ‘ Aisyiyah Yogyakarta Sebuah Pendekatan Integratif antara Technology Acceptance Model dan End User Computing Satisfaction,†Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
