KAJIAN LITERATUR MODEL KONSEPTUAL KEBERHASILAN E-GOVERNMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/komik.v2i1.981Abstract
The use of internet technology in the government environment is known as electronic government or e-government. In simple terms, e-government or digital government is an activity carried out by the government by using information technology support in providing services to the community. In line with the spirit of bureaucratic reform in Indonesia, e-government has a role in improving the quality of public services and helping the process of delivering information more effectively to the public. Over time, the application of e-Government has turned out to have mixed results. In developed countries, the application of e-Government systems in the scope of government has produced various benefits ranging from the efficiency of administrative processes and various innovations in the field of public services. But on the contrary in the case of developing countries including Indonesia, the results are more alarming where many government institutions face obstacles and even fail to achieve significant improvements in the quality of public services despite having adequate information and communication technology. The paradigm of bureaucrats who wrongly considers that the success of e-Government is mainly determined by technology. Even though there are many factors outside of technology that are more dominant as causes of failure such as organizational management, ethics and work culture. This study aims to develop a model of success in the application of e-Government from several best practice models in the field of information technology that have been widely used so far using literature studies as research methods. The results of the study show that the conceptual model of the success of the implementation of e-Government developed consists of 17 determinants of success..
Keywords: Model, Factor, Success, System, e-GovernmentReferences
HASIBUAN, Z.A. & SANTOSO, H. B. Standardisasi aplikasi e- government untuk instansi pemerintah. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Indonesia. ITB. 2005.
CAHYADI, E. E-Government: Suatu Tinjauan Konsep dan Permasalaah. Journal The Winners, 4(1), 1-12. 2003.
UNITED-NATIONS. UN E-Government survey 2014: e-Government for the future we want. Sumber: https://publicadministration.un.org. 2014.
MUNYOKA, W. & MANZIRA, F.M. Alignment of E-Government Policy Formulation with Practical Implementation: The Case of Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 7(12), 3034-3039. 2013.
NAPITUPULU, D. Kajian Faktor Sukses Implementasi E-Government Studi Kasus: Pemerintah Kota Bogor. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 5(3), 229-236. 2015.
SILALAHI, M., NAPITUPULU, D. & PATRIA, G. Kajian Konsep dan Kondisi E-Government di Indonesia. Jurnal Penerapan Ilmu-Ilmu Komputer, 1, 10-16. 2015
KUMOROTOMO, W. Kegagalan penerapan e-Government dan kegiatan tidak produktif dengan internet. Sumber: http://Kumoro.Staff.Ugm.Ac.Id/Wp-Content/Uploads/2009/01/Kegagalan-Penerapan-Egov.Pdf. 2009.
INDRAJIT, R. E. Electronic government: strategi pembangunan dan pengembangan sistem pelayanan publik berbasis teknologi digital. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI. 2002.
NAPITUPULU, D. & SENSUSE, D. The Critical Success Factors Study for e-Government Implementation. International Journal of Computer Applications, 89(16), 23-32. 2014.
GIL-GARCIA, J.R. & PARDO, T.A. E-Government success factors: mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Gov. Inform. Quart., 22, 187-216. 2005
FORTUNE, J. & WHITE, D. Framing of project critical success factors by a systems model. Int. J. Project Management, 24, 53-65. 2006.
YOON, J. & CHAE, M. Varying criticality of key success factors of national e-strategy along the status of economic development of nations. Gov. Inform. Quart., 26, 25-34. 2009.
FURUHOLT, B. & WAHID, F. E-Government challenges and the role of political leadership in indonesia: the case of sragen. Proceeding of the 41st International Conference on System Sciences, 411-421. 2008.
JUNAIDI. Dukungan E-Government Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Elayanan Publik Di Era Otonomi Daerah : Kasus Best Practices Dari Sejumlah Daerah Di Indonesia. Proceeding Simposium Nasional Otonomi Daerah, LAB-ANE FISIP Untirta. 2011.
HEEKS, R. Most egovernment for development projects fail: how can risks be reduced. Institute for Development Policy and Management. Sumber: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/NISPAcee/UNPAN015488.pdf. 2003.
IRANI, Z. et. al. Evaluating E-Government: Learning from the Experiences of Two UK Local Authorities Information Systems Journal, 15, pp. 61-82, 2005.
HAKIM, S. Evaluasi Tingkat Penerimaan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Kepegawaian (SIMPEG) Pada Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI). Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2009.
PARASURAMAN, A. Technology readiness index (TRI): a multiple- item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320. 2000.
DAVIS, F.D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339. 1989.
AGARWAL, R. & PRASAD, J. A. conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215. 1998.
VENKATESH, ET. AL. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. 2003.
ISMAIL, N., ABDULLAH, N. & SHAMSUDIN, A. Adoption of hospital information system (HIS) in Malaysian public hospitals. Procedia— Soc. Behav. Sci., 336–343. 2015.
MOHAMADALI, N.K. & GARIBALDI, J.M. A novel evaluation model of user acceptance of software technology in health-care sector. Proceedings from the International Conference on Health Informatics, 392–397. 2010.
DELONE W.H. & MCLEAN, E.R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a 10-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. 2003.
WARKENTIN, M., GEFEN, D., PAVLOU, P. & ROSE, G. Encouraging Citizen Adoption of e- Government by Building Trust. Electronic Markets, 12(3). 2002.
Abu-Shanab, S.A., Al-Rub. & Nor, K.M. Obstacles facing the adoption of e-government services in Jordan. Journal of E- Governance, 33, 35-47. 2010.
BERDYKHANOVA, D., DEHGHANTANHA, A. & HARIRAJ, K. Trust challenges and issues of e-government: e-tax prospective. International Journal of Computer Science Security, 8(7), 62-66. 2010.
FAISAL, M.N. & RAHMAN, Z. E-government in India:modelling the barriers to its adoption and diffusion. Electronic Government. An International Journal, 5(2), 181-202. 2008.
BANDURA, A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY, US: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co. 1997.
VENKATESH, ET. AL. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. 2003.
LEE, ET AL. Implications of modifying the duration requirement of generalized anxiety disorder in developed and developing countries. Psychol Med., 39(7): 1163–1176. 2009.
KRISHNARAJU, V., MATHEW, S. & SUGUMARAN, V. Role of Web Personalization in Consumer Acceptance of E-Government Services. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 15-17. 2013.
KALAMATIANOU, M.A. & MALAMATENIOU, F. An Extended UTAUT2 Model for e-Government Project Evaluation. The Eleventh International Conference on Digital Society and eGovernments. 2017.
LIMAYEM, M., HIRT, S. G., & CHEUNG, C. M. How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information system continuance. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 705–737. 2007.
