Analisis Performa WireGuard dan OpenVPN pada VPN Perbankan Berbasis MikroTik menggunakan ICMP, iPerf3, dan Mann–Whitney
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/jurikom.v13i1.9438Keywords:
Ping, ICMP, Throughput, Resource, MikroTik, Iperf3, Mann–WhitneyAbstract
The banking industry necessitates secure and reliable site-to-site connectivity between data centres and branch offices to support transactions, data replication, and monitoring that is sensitive to latency, jitter, and packet loss. In practice, VPN gateways often operate concurrently with routing and security functions, leading to specific issues characterised by a trade-off between network service quality and processing overhead on gateway devices. Given that OpenVPN remains widely used while WireGuard is increasingly adopted as a more streamlined protocol, there is a need for measurable evidence to determine the most suitable protocol in a banking environment based on MikroTik routers. This study aims to compare the performance of WireGuard and OpenVPN across three dimensions: connection quality via ICMP Ping (minimum/average/maximum round-trip time, jitter, packet loss), transfer capacity using iPerf3 in TCP/UDP scenarios (download and upload), and processing efficiency through monitoring of CPU and memory usage. Data will be summarised using descriptive statistics and tested with the Mann–Whitney U test under equivalent test conditions. The results indicate that WireGuard provides better delay stability (lower average/maximum round-trip time and jitter) and more efficient CPU utilisation compared to OpenVPN, whereas throughput is context-dependent, with WireGuard generally excelling in UDP scenarios and OpenVPN performing better in certain TCP situations. The contribution of this research lies in the replicable testing methodology and quantitative evidence that serves as a foundation for recommending VPN protocol selection for banking based on network performance, resource efficiency, and service continuity.
References
[1] C. Fu et al., “A Generic High-Performance Architecture for VPN Gateways,” Electronics (Basel), vol. 13, no. 11, p. 2031, May 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13112031.
[2] D. Xue et al., “OpenVPN is Open to VPN Fingerprinting,” Commun ACM, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 79–87, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1145/3618117.
[3] S. Ruhault, P. Lafourcade, and D. Mahmoud, “A Unified Symbolic Analysis of WireGuard,” in Proceedings 2024 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, Reston, VA: Internet Society, Feb. 2024. doi: 10.14722/ndss.2024.24364.
[4] S. Mackey, I. Mihov, A. Nosenko, F. Vega, and Y. Cheng, “A Performance Comparison of WireGuard and OpenVPN,” in Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Mar. 2020, pp. 162–164. doi: 10.1145/3374664.3379532.
[5] J. Anyam, R. R. Singh, H. Larijani, and A. Philip, “Empirical Performance Analysis of WireGuard vs. OpenVPN in Cloud and Virtualised Environments Under Simulated Network Conditions,” Computers, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 326, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.3390/computers14080326.
[6] D.-F. HRITCAN, A. GRAUR, D. G. BALAN, and E. M. TIMOFTE, “A Performance Analysis of VPN Technologies Used in an IoT Environment,” Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 81–88, 2025, doi: 10.4316/AECE.2025.02009.
[7] A. F. Gentile, D. Macrì, F. De Rango, M. Tropea, and E. Greco, “A VPN Performances Analysis of Constrained Hardware Open Source Infrastructure Deploy in IoT Environment,” Future Internet, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 264, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3390/fi14090264.
[8] D. Novianto, Y. S. Japriadi, and L. Tommy, “Implementasi Keamanan Akses Terhadap Website Menggunakan Wireguard VPN Di Routerboard Mikrotik,” Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika Global, vol. 13, no. 2, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.36982/jiig.v13i2.2308.
[9] L. O. Sari and H. Helena, “Implementasi Virtual Private Network MenggunakanLayer 2 Tunneling Protocol Berbasis Mikrotik,” MALCOM: Indonesian Journal of Machine Learning and Computer Science, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1496–1504, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.57152/malcom.v4i4.1651.
[10] Surono and G. Guntoro Setiaji, “Analisa Perbandingan Quality of Service Protokol VPN antara Protokol SSTP Dan Open VPN Berbasis Router Mikrotik,” Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, vol. 11, no. 1, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.33022/ijcs.v11i1.3034.
[11] D. L. Amenyo Fiase, K. Opoku Attah, S. Lartey, D. Adjin, and M. M.- Lisa Allotey, “Evaluating the Impact of Network Latency on user Experience in Telecommunication Industries in Ghana,” International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT), pp. 2861–2869, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24AUG1437.
[12] J. Bienik, M. Uhrina, L. Sevcik, and A. Holesova, “Impact of Packet Loss Rate on Quality of Compressed High Resolution Videos,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 5, p. 2744, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23052744.



