Determining Citizens Eligibility for Cash Assistance Using the BORDA Method

Andriansyah Putra; Muhammad Ardiansyah Sembiring; Mardalius

doi:10.30865/jurikom.v12i4.8854

Authors

Andriansyah Putra Universitas Royal, Asahan
Muhammad Ardiansyah Sembiring Universitas Royal, Asahan
Mardalius Universitas Royal, Asahan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/jurikom.v12i4.8854

Keywords:

Decision Support System, Direct Cash Assistance, BORDA Method, Eligibility Determination, Multi-Criteria Decision Making

Abstract

The Bandar Lama Village Head Office has implemented a Direct Cash Assistance distribution system as an effort to help underprivileged people meet their daily needs. However, the selection process for aid recipients is still carried out manually and conventionally, which has the potential to cause inaccuracy in targeting, human error, and low time efficiency and accuracy of decision making. The absence of an integrated digital system and the use of selection methods that are not yet based on criteria weighting have caused inequality in the distribution of aid, leading to complaints from community members and ineffective program implementation. To overcome these problems, this study proposes the implementation of a web-based Decision Support System using the BORDA method. The BORDA method is a multi-criteria decision-making approach that allows for systematic evaluation of multiple criteria simultaneously, providing more objective and consistent results in the selection process. This system incorporates various socio-economic indicators such as income level, family size, housing conditions, and employment status to ensure comprehensive assessment of each applicant's eligibility. Based on the results of the BORDA method calculation on 30 tested resident data, it was obtained that a resident named Tomy had the highest score of 70, followed by Ranto Simanjuntak with a score of 70, and Marianik with a score of 67. With this BORDA method-based system, aid distribution in Bandar Lama Village can be carried out more accurately, fairly, and transparently, ultimately improving the effectiveness of social assistance programs and ensuring that aid reaches those who need it most.

References

A. Ardiyansah et al., “Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi dalam Penerimaan Peserta Didik Baru (PPDB) di SMA Enterpreneurship Bi’rul Ulum Serang,” WINDRADI: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 6–13, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.61332/windradi.v2i1.168.

W. K. Febriani UIN ABDURRAHMAN WAHID PEKALONGAN, “Strategi Pemasaran Perbankan Syariah Berbasis Teknologi Informasi Pada Era Digital,” 2024.

R. Akbar, M. Irwan Padli Nasution, P. Studi Manajemen, and F. Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, “Peran Sistem Informasi Dalam Mengambil Keputusan,” Peran Sistem Informasi (Rohid Akbar, dkk.) JoSES: Journal of Sharia Economics Scholar, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–4, 2023, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10276994.

M. Amin and J. Hutahaean, “Seleksi Penerimaan Desainer Grafis Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Menerapkan Metode OCRA,” Journal of Informatics Management and Information Technology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 131–137, 2024, doi: 10.47065/jimat.v4i4.413.

Maria Yasinta Mau Rema, Yoseph D. Da Yen Khwuta, and Elvira Esperanza Sala, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Masyarakat Penerima Bantuan Program Keluarga Harapan Metode SAW,” SATESI: Jurnal Sains Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 91–100, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.54259/satesi.v2i2.1114.

S. J. Penelitian et al., “Penerapan Bantuan Langsung Tunai (BLT) pada keluarga miskin di Desa Tolite Jaya, Kecamatan Tolinggula, Kabupaten Gorontalo Implementation of Direct Cash Assistance for low-income families in Tolite Jaya Village, Tolinggula District, Gorontalo Regency,” 2024.

Gema Otheliansyah and Riedho Hizwar, “Pengaruh Bantuan Langsung Tunai Dana Desa dan Kemandirian Desa di Masa Pandemi terhadap Kemiskinan Desa di Indonesia,” Jurnal Manajemen Perbendaharaan, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 94–105, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.33105/jmp.v4i2.409.

Nia Eka Safitri and Indah Murti, “Implementasi Kebijakan Program Bantuan Langsung Tunai Bagi Masyarakat Miskin di Kelurahan Sidotopo Wetan,” Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 169–178, May 2024, doi: 10.55606/birokrasi.v2i2.1182.

H. Amnur and N. Sisma Putri, “Deni Satria Group Decision Support System untuk Menentukan Kelayakan Penerima Bantuan Sosial dengan Metode AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) dan Borda JITSI,” 2022. [Online]. Available: http://jurnal-itsi.org

S. Awalia and S. A. Sumayya, “Analisis Efektivitas Program Bantuan Langsung Tunai dalam Mengurangi Kemiskinan di Pedesaan.” [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.ipdn.ac.id/JEKP/

D. Purbaningrum, ; Hendri, H. Adinugraha, I. Negeri, K. H. Abdurrahman, and W. Pekalongan, “TRANSFORMASI KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK: MENYIASATI KETIDAKTEPATAN SASARAN BANTUAN SOSIAL DI DESA PRINGSURAT UNTUK KESEJAHTERAAN MASYARAKAT YANG LEBIH BAIK,” 2024. [Online]. Available: www.journal.uniga.ac.id

N. Cintya Resti, N. Fadilatul Ilmiyah, and I. Kediri, “PENERAPAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING (SAW) DAN METODE BORDA COUNT DALAM OPTIMALISASI PEMILIHAN KANDIDAT TERBAIK PENERIMA BEASISWA,” J. Ris. & Ap. Mat, vol. 06, no. 02, pp. 179–192, 2022.

N. Fadilatul Ilmiyah, Q. Nada Salsabela, N. Rohmah, and A. Nisa, “IMPLEMENTATION OF MULTI-ATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY AND BORDA COUNT METHOD FOR SELECTING TAHFIDZUL QUR’AN ISLAMIC BOARDING SCHOOLS.”

I. Dwi Jaya and D. Marwah, “Penerapan Metode Smart Dan Borda Dalam Pemilihan Penerima Bantuan pada Komunitas Ketimbang Ngemis Application of Smart and Borda Methods in the Selection of Beneficiaries in the Ketimbang Ngemis Community,” 2024.

Akhmad Fajaruddin, “PERANCANGAN SISTEM INFORMASI PENDATAAN,” 2022.

W. Agustiawan, V. Rosalina, and A. Purnamasari, “A Decision Support System for Determining the Best Customer Using the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) 1,” 2023.

Priyandini Pramithasari, Prisa Marga Kusumantara, and Seftin Fitri Ana Wati, “Analisis Metode SAW-WP-TOPSIS Dan Borda Count Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supervisor,” Jurnal Publikasi Sistem Informasi dan Manajemen Bisnis, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 10–21, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.55606/jupsim.v3i2.2689.

F. Fitriyani, B. Adiwinoto, E. Helmud, A. A. Alkodri, and A. Anisah, “GDSS Penilaian Kinerja Pada ISB Atma Luhur Menggunakan Metode SAW dan Borda,” Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi dan Komputer), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 136–141, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v11i1.1382.

T. O. Pamungkas, M. Rifai, and K. Soeryodarundino, “Sustainable Civil Building Management Penerapan Lean Construction menggunakan Root Cause Analysis dan Metode Borda dalam mengidentifikasi Waste Non-Value Added Activity (Studi Kasus: Proyek Pembangunan Bendungan Jragung Paket I PT Waskita Karya),” and Engineering Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.47134/scbmej.v1.

J. Perintis, K. Km, A. K. Jailani, A. Erna, and N. H. Indra, “PROSIDING SEMINAR ILMIAH SISTEM INFORMASI DAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat (P3M) Universitas Dipa Makassar Evaluasi Performa dan Sensitivitas Metode Agregasi Preferensi dalam Seleksi Pemenang Lomba Desain Poster Islami.”

S. Z. N. Al Hasani, Q. N. Salsabela, and E. Z. Permata Sari, “Implementasi Metode TOPSIS dan Borda Count dalam Penentuan RTLH (Rumah Tidak Layak Huni) (Studi Kasus: Kampung Inggris Pare, Kediri),” Jurnal Matematika Integratif, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 35–46, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.24198/jmi.v20.n1.52227.35-46.