Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Akademik Satya Wacana Menerapkan Model for Mandatory Use of Software Technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/jurikom.v10i2.5837Keywords:
Academic Information System, Model for Mandatory Use of Software Technologies, MMUSTAbstract
There are many theories and methods that can be used to evaluate information systems. For example TAM, Wixom and Todd, DeLone and McLean, etc. These models are not suitable to evaluate information systems that are implemented in mandatory environments where the users have to use the system whether they prefer to use it or not. This study aims to explore the variables that can affect the level of use of SIASAT (Satya Wacana Academic Information System). This research was carried out to find out how significant the influence of the factors that can influence SIASAT users. This study using BSR (Behavioral Science Research) approach with quantitative methods through data collection using questionnaire. For data analysis, statistical analysis was carried out using PLS-SEM through SmartPLS 4 software. Based on the results of the study it can be interpreted that there is a significant relationship between performance expectations and user attitudes in SIASAT usage. This can be seen from the relationship between the variables PE -> AT which has the highest T-Statistic value, 24,877. Variabel with highest effect is the Information Satisfaction variable with an R-Square value of 0.655. Of the eight hypotheses tested, it was concluded that six of them were accepted and two were rejected. This is because the two hypotheses using the Use variable with a Cronbach's Alpha value below 0.7 (0.576) these variables considered unreliable thus two hypotheses are rejected.
References
W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, “Information Systems Success Measurement,†Foundations and Trends® in Information Systems, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–116, 2016, doi: 10.1561/2900000005.
F. Davis and F. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,†MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, p. 319, Sep. 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.
B. H. Wixom and P. A. Todd, “A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance,†Research, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 85–102, 2005, doi: 10.1287/isre.l050.0042.
W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, “The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update,†in Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9–30. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748.
C. E. Koh, V. R. Prybutok, and S. D. Ryan, “A Model for Mandatory Use of Software Technologies,†2010.
F. Nah, X. Tan, and S. Teh, “An Empirical Investigation on End-Users’ Acceptance of Enterprise Systems,†IRMJ, vol. 17, pp. 32–53, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.4018/irmj.2004070103.
J. Hartwick and H. Barki, “Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use,†1994. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.orgURL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/2632752
S. Taylor and P. A. Todd, “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models,†1995. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.orgURL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/23011007
V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies,†Manage Sci, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186–204, 2000, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
T. W. Santoso, “Analisis terhadap Penggunaan Sistem Informasi dengan Menggunakan Kerangka Model for Mandatory Use of Software Technologies pada Aplikasi Sistem Keuangan dan Akuntansi Satya Wacana (SIKASA) di Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga,†Program Studi Sistem Informasi FTI-UKSW, 2017.
N. Rani, R. Ruliansyah, and M. L. Dalafranka, “Analisis Penerimaan dan Penggunaan Aplikasi E-LKP UIN Raden Fatah Palembang Menggunakan Model for Mandatory Use of Software Technologies,†Journal of Computer and Information Systems Ampera, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 190–207, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.51519/journalcisa.v2i3.132.
M. A. Kristy, P. I. Santosa, and R. Ferdiana, “A Model for Understanding Mandatory System Implementation: A Literature Review,†JATISI (Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1024–1037, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.35957/jatisi.v9i2.1874.
S. A. Brown, A. P. Massey, M. M. Montoya-Weiss, and J. R. Burkman, “Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology,†European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 283–295, 2002, doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000438.
J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “The results of PLS-SEM article information,†European Business Review, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–24, 2018.
G. Shmueli et al., “Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict,†Eur J Mark, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 2322–2347, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189.
M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, J. H. Cheah, H. Ting, O. I. Moisescu, and L. Radomir, “Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM,†Tourism Economics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 531–554, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1354816618823921.
J. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7.
P. Sugiyono, “Metode Penelitian Manajemen,†Bandung: Alfabeta Cv, 2016.
S. M. Rasoolimanesh, “Discriminant validity assessment in PLS-SEM: A comprehensive composite-based approach,†Data Analysis Perspectives Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2022.
R. Solling Hamid and S. M Anwar, “Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Berbasis Varian.†PT Inkubator Penulis Indonesia, 2019.
