Kerangka Kerja Indikator Pengukuran Tingkat Kematangan Transformasi Digital Perguruan Tinggi

Authors

  • Yanuar Firdaus Arie Wibowo Universitas Telkom, Bandung
  • Dawam Dwi Jatmiko Suwawi Universitas Telkom, Bandung
  • Widia Febriyani Universitas Telkom, Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/jurikom.v9i5.5004

Keywords:

Framework, Digital Transformation, Maturity, Measuring Instrument, Measuring Indicator

Abstract

Strategic planning is an essential part of the college life cycle; a critical aspect of planning is the digital transformation of universities. Digital transformation supports university business processes and is a riving engine for universities to adapt to changes to provide added value for the best services for all stakeholders. To achieve this, universities need an overview of the maturity level of digital transformation that has been achieved today. This research produces a new methodology for assessment in a holistic framework as an indicator of measuring the maturity level of digital transformation.This measuring tool must be easy to use by universities when they will take measurements for all academics and easily understood by all respondents who are determined to provide an accurate picture of the maturity level of digital transformation. The final result is presented in the form of a framework that contains a standard value index of maturity level, and recommendations for digital transformation as a form of self-evaluation for higher education strategic planning

References

T. Gollhardt, S. Halsbenning, A. Hermann, A. Karsakova, and J. Becker, “Development of a Digital Transformation Maturity Model for IT Companies,†Proc. - 2020 IEEE 22nd Conf. Bus. Informatics, CBI 2020, vol. 1, pp. 94–103, 2020, doi: 10.1109/CBI49978.2020.00018.

M. Bitzer, N. Brinz, and P. Ollig, “Disentangling the Concept of Information Security Properties-Enabling Effective Information Security Governance Digital Transformation of Incumbent Organizations View project Sichere Industrie 4.0 in Schwaben View project,†no. May, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2021_rp/134.

T. Aguiar, S. B. Gomes, P. R. Da Cunha, and M. M. Da Silva, “Digital transformation capability maturity model framework,†Proc. - 2019 IEEE 23rd Int. Enterp. Distrib. Object Comput. Conf. EDOC 2019, no. Section VI, pp. 51–57, 2019, doi: 10.1109/EDOC.2019.00016.

V. ; Äurek, N. ; Kadoić, and Ž. Dobrović, “Digital Maturity of Higher Education Institution: A meta model of the Analytical Network Process (ANP) and Decision EXpert (DEX),†pp. 223–230, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:211:826694.

P. C. Verhoef et al., “Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda,†J. Bus. Res., vol. 122, no. July 2018, pp. 889–901, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022.

D. Ifenthaler and M. Egloffstein, “Development and Implementation of a Maturity Model of Digital Transformation,†TechTrends, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 302–309, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11528-019-00457-4.

P. Smith, “The Gordian Knot of Practicing Digital Transformation: Coping with Emergent Paradoxes in Ambidextrous Organizing Structures*,†vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–26, 2020, doi: 10.1111/jpim.12548.

J. Bumann and M. Peter, “Action fields of digital transformation–a review and comparative analysis of digital transformation maturity models and frameworks,†Digit. und And. Innov. im Manag., vol. 2, no. November, pp. 13–40, 2019.

R. Teichert, “Digital transformation maturity: A systematic review of literature,†Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun., vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1673–1687, 2019, doi: 10.11118/actaun201967061673.

M. H. Othman, R. Razali, and M. F. Nasrudin, “Key factors for e-government towards sustainable development goals,†Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 6 Special Issue, pp. 2864–2876, 2020.

S. Krishnamurthy, “The future of business education: A commentary in the shadow of the Covid-19 pandemic,†J. Bus. Res., vol. 117, no. May, pp. 1–5, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.034.

D. Pranita, D. D. Kesa, and Marsdenia, “Digitalization Methods from Scratch Nature towards Smart Tourism Village; Lessons from Tanjung Bunga Samosir, Indonesia,†J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1933, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012053.

E. Abad-Segura, M. D. González-Zamar, J. C. Infante-Moro, and G. R. García, “Sustainable management of digital transformation in higher education: Global research trends,†Sustain., vol. 12, no. 5, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12052107.

A. Joshi, J. Benitez, T. Huygh, L. Ruiz, and S. De Haes, “Impact of IT governance process capability on business performance: Theory and empirical evidence,†Decis. Support Syst., vol. 153, no. February, p. 113668, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2021.113668.

A. I. Said and M. Angelita, “Determining Factors for Success of Banking Digital Transformation,†vol. 149, no. Apmrc 2019, pp. 238–241, 2020, doi: 10.2991/aebmr.k.200812.041.

Additional Files

Published

2022-10-31

How to Cite

Arie Wibowo, Y. F., Suwawi, D. D. J., & Febriyani, W. (2022). Kerangka Kerja Indikator Pengukuran Tingkat Kematangan Transformasi Digital Perguruan Tinggi. JURNAL RISET KOMPUTER (JURIKOM), 9(5), 1575−1583. https://doi.org/10.30865/jurikom.v9i5.5004