Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pemasok Batik Ruzza Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/jurikom.v9i4.4562Keywords:
Supplier Selection, Batik, SAW, SPKAbstract
Batik Ruzza is a batik industry UMKM that was developed in the Pekalongan area, Central Java. The trademark "Batik Ruzza" has been producing batik clothes for more than 20 years. Batik Ruzza in carrying out its activities is very focused on raw materials, quality, completeness, and service. The problem with MSME Batik Ruzza is that there is a defect in the Batik Ruzza product which causes a buildup of clothing products that cannot be sold on the market. This is partly due to the non-optimal selection of raw material suppliers for batik clothes to improve the quality of Batik Ruzza products. The purpose of this research is to determine the right criteria for the company in determining the supplier of raw materials appropriately. The method used is Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). The basic concept of the SAW method is to find the weighted sum of the performance ratings for each alternative on all attributes. The selected criteria attributes are price, quality, completeness, delivery, and service. Based on the calculations carried out, it was found that the best supplier recommendation was the alternative A5 or Tiara which was worthy of being used as a supplier of batik cloth for Batik Ruzza clothing products
References
L. M. Hakim, “Batik Sebagai Warisan Budaya Bangsa dan Nation Brand Indonesia,†Nation State J. Int. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 61–90, 2018, doi: 10.24076/nsjis.2018v1i1.90.
M. Masiswo, J. Setiawan, V. Atika, and G. B. Mandegani, “Karakteristik Fisik Produk Batik Dan Tiruan Batik,†Din. Kerajinan dan Batik Maj. Ilm., vol. 34, no. 2, p. 103, 2017, doi: 10.22322/dkb.v34i2.3439.
E. Marganus, “Analisis Keunggulan Komparatif dan Kompetitif Ekspor Batik Indonesia Analysis of the Comparative and Competitive Advantages of Indonesian Batik Exports,†Diversity, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 124–125, 2021.
M. I. H. Wijaya, N. M. Ariani, and B. N. Priambudi, “Identifikasi Peran Kewilayahan Dalam Pengembangan Produk Unggulan Batik di Kawasan Pekalongan,†Kajen J. Penelit. dan Pengemb. Pembang., vol. 4, no. 02, pp. 112–122, 2020, doi: 10.54687/jurnalkajenv4i02.4.
D. I. K. Pekalongan, “IDENTIFIKASI PEMBELAJARAN SOSIAL DALAM PENGEMBANGAN BATIK,†vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 2021.
T. R. Prasetiani and C. R. Sutrisno, “Re-Formulation Business Strategy Pada Umkm Industri Batik Pekalongan Memasuki Era New Normal,†J. Ekon. dan Bisnis, vol. Vol. 24, N, no. 3, pp. 246–260, 2021, [Online]. Available: www.jurnal.unikal.ac.id/index.php/jebi%0ARE-FORMULATION.
S. Hidayatuloh and N. N. Qisthani, “Pengukuran Kinerja Rantai Pasok Industri Batik Tipe MTO Menggunakan SCOR 12.0 Dan AHP,†J. Rekayasa Sist. Ind., vol. 7, p. 76, 2020, doi: 10.25124/jrsi.v7i2.436.
S. Suwandi, “Karakteristik Wirausaha Mapan dan Potensial Ekspor (Studi Pada Wirausaha Mapan Di Kota Pekalongan),†… Entrep. Manag. Ind. …, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 105–108, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.bakrie.ac.id/index.php/JEMI/article/view/1893%0Ahttp://jurnal.bakrie.ac.id/index.php/JEMI/article/viewFile/1893/1505.
Sumanto, L. S. Marita, K. Indriani, L. Mazia, A. Christian, and R. Amin, “Comparison of Multi Criteria Decision Making Method ( WP , SAW & TOPSIS ) for best supplier selection .,†pp. 203–213, 2021.
A. Çalık, “A novel Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for green supplier selection in the Industry 4.0 era,†Soft Comput., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 2253–2265, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00500-020-05294-9.
J. Hutagalung, “Studi Kelayakan Pemilihan Supplier Perlengkapan Dan ATK Menggunakan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting),†J-SAKTI (Jurnal Sains Komput. dan Inform., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 356, 2019, doi: 10.30645/j-sakti.v3i2.154.
J. Media and I. Budidarma, “Perbandingan Metode WP dan SAW dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Menentukan Tingkat Keberhasilan Guru Mengajar di Tingkat SMK,†vol. 6, no. April, pp. 923–932, 2022, doi: 10.30865/mib.v6i2.3571.
I. P. Pertiwi, F. Fedinandus, and A. D. Limantara, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,†CAHAYAtech, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 182, 2019, doi: 10.47047/ct.v8i2.46.
R. W. Nugraha and Nursholihah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Studi Kasus Pt Swiss Yuta Jaya ),†J. Ilm. Tek. Inform., vol. 6, no. 456, pp. 30–38, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/buffer/article/view/2885.
S. D. Hapid et al., “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penyeleksian Supplier Bahan Produksi Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),†vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 33–37, 2020.
C. S. Pramudyo and D. E. H. Purnomo, “Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Pemilihan Pemasok Nata de Coco dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,†J. Ilm. Tek. Ind., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 80–90, 2012.
A. A. Trixie, “Filosofi Motif Batik Sebagi Identitas Bangsa Indonesia,†Folio, vol. Vol 1 No 1, pp. 1–9, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://journal.uc.ac.id/index.php/FOLIO/article/view/1380.
