Penentuan Skala Prioritas Pengembangan Smart Campus Menggunakan Metode AHP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/jurikom.v8i6.3773Keywords:
Smart Campus, Smart Technology, Infrastructure, Priority Calculation, AHPAbstract
Smart Campus is a trend nowadays that allows educational institutions to make various breakthroughs, one of which is combining smart technology with infrastructure to get services, decisions, and sustainability. The research aims to determine the aspects that will be the priority of several components towards or get priority rankings for implementation towards a smart campus. The priority measurement of several smart campus components uses the AHP model which is able to compare and evaluate several scales. The comparison process is carried out using a rating scale based on the point of view of one of the top management on campus as a stakeholder. The methods used are literature study, questionnaire distribution, scale calculation, and priority scale recommendations. The results showed that the calculation of the criteria matrix and alternative matrices were able to produce value ratings, the People Management System aspect became the first priority alternative by 31%. The abstraction level approach can be calculated using the AHP model to get the priority scale for smart campus developmentReferences
W. Muhamad, N. B. Kurniawan, Suhardi, and S. Yazid, “Smart Campus Features, Technologies, and Applications: A Systematic Literature Review,†in International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI), Oct. 2017, pp. 384–391.
S. Du, F. Meng, and B. Gao, “Research on the Application System of Smart Campus in the Context of Smart City,†in 8th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education, 2016, pp. 714–718. doi: 10.1109/ITME.2016.25.
E. M. Malatji, “The Development of a Smart Campus - African Universities Point of View,†Mar. 2017.
W. Villegas-Ch, X. Palacios-Pacheco, and S. Luján-Mora, “Application of a smart city model to a traditional university campus with a big data architecture: A sustainable smart campus,†Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 10, May 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11102857.
M. W. Sari, P. W. Ciptadi, and R. H. Hardyanto, “Study of Smart Campus Development Using Internet of Things Technology,†in IAES International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics, Nov. 2017, vol. 755, no. 1, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001.
Y. A. Adenle, E. H. W. Chan, Y. Sun, and C. K. Chau, “Assessing the relative importance of sustainability indicators for smart campuses: A case of higher education institutions in Nigeria,†Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, vol. 9, pp. 1–7, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.indic.2020.100092.
N. Min-Allah and S. Alrashed, “Smart campus—A sketch,†Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 59, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102231.
S. Li, Y. Shi, L. Zhanbo, and W. Fang, “A Study on the Maturity Evaluation System of Local Universities’ Smart Campus Environment Based on Fuzzy,†Forest Chemicals Review, pp. 1265–1272, Oct. 2021, [Online]. Available: www.forestchemicalsreview.com
D. Zhicheng and L. Feng, “Evaluation of the smart campus information portal,†in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Nov. 2018, pp. 73–79. doi: 10.1145/3291078.3291083.
L. Yu, “Research on evaluation index of green campus based on AHP method,†in 2016 International Conference on Intelligent Transportation, Big Data and Smart City, ICITBS 2016, Sep. 2017, pp. 249–252. doi: 10.1109/ICITBS.2016.25.
X. Chen, “Evaluation Index System of the Smart New Campus Construction of Universities,†Converter Magazine, vol. 2021, no. 7, 2021, [Online]. Available: www.converter-magazine.info
Z. Dai, C. Sun, L. Zhao, and Z. Li, “Assessment of Smart Learning Environments in Higher Educational Institutions: A Study Using AHP-FCE and GA-BP Methods,†IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 35487–35500, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3062680.
B. Awuzie, A. B. Ngowi, T. Omotayo, L. Obi, and J. Akotia, “Facilitating successful smart campus transitions: A systems thinking-SWOT analysis approach,†Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1–21, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11052044.
R. Umar, A. Fadlil, U. Ahmad Dahlan, and Y. Yogyakarta, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Metode AHP untuk Penilaian Kompetensi Soft Skill Karyawan,†Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informatika, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 27–34, Jun. 2018.
A. E. Munthafa and H. Mubarok, “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Mahasiswa Berprestasi,†Jurnal Siliwangi, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 192–201, 2017.
E. Rosiska and R. Harman, “Metode Analitical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Dalam Pemilihan Umum Presiden Indonesia 2019,†InfoTekJar (Jurnal Nasional Informatika dan Teknologi Jaringan), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 193–202, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.30743/infotekjar.v3i2.1067.
R. Aurachman, “Proses Pengambilan Data pada AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) Menggunakan Pinsip Closed Loop Control System,†JISI : JURNAL INTEGRASI SISTEM INDUSTRI VOLUME, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 55–64, 2019, doi: 10.24853/jisi.6.1.55-64.
X. Xu, Y. Wang, and S. Yu, “Teaching performance evaluation in smart campus,†IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 77754–77766, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2884022.
P. Ferro Ferdinant, I. S. M. Ade, and N. Wahyuni, “Pengukuran Kriteria Green and Smart Campus dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process,†Journal Industrial Servicess, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 223–230, Mar. 2021, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/jiss
