Komparasi Metode Weighted Product (WP) Dan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Pemberian Beasiswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/json.v4i1.4593Keywords:
Scholarship, DSS, Weighted Product (WP), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), SDN 4 Mentawa Baru HuluAbstract
Technology is currently developing quite widely, information technology is not only technology that functions to work and store data, but also information technology to send or disseminate data. in the selection of scholarships at SDN 4 Mentawa Baru Hulu Sampit in determining the PIP scholarships still using the manual method so that it can cause inefficiencies in the management of scholarship data, as well as errors in determining scholarship recipients. Data management is also done manually, this also causes the process of identifying scholarship decisions to be slow. From these problems, we need a scholarship decision support system that can use data management and also determine scholarship decisions. The author builds a scholarship acceptance decision support system by comparing the WP and SAW methods. it is hoped that this method can determine the right method to be applied in determining scholarships, and can assist school principals and school operators in processing scholarship assessments. Based on the final calculation results, the SAW method and the WP method can produce different scholarship ratings. Based on the WP = Nanang Sujana method as the best alternative and followed by other best alternatives A3, A4, A1, and A2, then the SAW method was obtained by Radhiyatul Maulida as the best alternative and followed by other alternatives A2, A3, A4, and A5. From the comparison results with the MSE (Mean Squared Error) method, the Weighted Product (WP) method produces a higher deviation value than the Simple Addative Weighting (SAW), with a comparison of the deviation value, namely the WP method = 4363,47509 while the SAW method is obtained = 4259 , 71350. Therefore, the Weighted Product (WP) method can be recommended in making scholarship selection decisions at SDN 4 Mentawa Baru Hulu Sampit.
References
M. P. Asmawati S, S.Kom. et al., SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN. CV. MEDIA SAINS INDONESIA, 2020.
D. Kurniawati1, M. Arhami2, and Husaini3, “Penggunaan Metode Weighted Product Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Pembelian Rumah di Kota Lhokseumawe.,†J. Teknol. Rekayasa Inf. dan Komput., vol. Vol.3 No.1, no. ISSN: 2581-2882, 2019.
A. Nizar, F. Marisa, P. Studi, T. Informatika, F. Teknik, and U. W. Malang, “Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( SAW ) Untuk Menentukan Tampilan Perangkat Lunak Berdasarkan Prinsip Usability,†vol. 3, no. 3, 2018.
J. Riyanto, “Perbandingan Metode Weighted Product (WP) dan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Penilaian Kinerja Guru pada Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Negeri 3 Jakarta,†J. Inform. Univ. Pamulang, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 179, 2017, doi: 10.32493/informatika.v2i4.1438.
I. Anggraeni, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode SAW Dan Weight Product pada Pemilihan Calon Ketua Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa (BEM) Universitas Pakuan,†J. Komput. Terap., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 203–212, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.pcr.ac.id.
Dedek Cahyati Panjaitan, Hengki Juliansa, Robi Yanto, “Perbandingan Metode Saw Dan Wp Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Kasus Pemilihan Kegiatan Ekstrakulikuler,†J. Ilm. Bin. STMIK Bina Nusant. Jaya Lubuklinggau, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 30–38, 2021, doi: 10.52303/jb.v3i1.38.
E. D. Sri Mulyani, “Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode SAW Dengan WP Dalam Pemberian Pinjaman,†CogITo Smart J., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 239, 2019, doi: 10.31154/cogito.v5i2.151.239-251.
P. Oktavia, “Sistem pendukung keputusan seleksi penerima beasiswa dengan metode Wighted Product pada SMP N 1 Parung berbasis web,†vol. 67, no. issn 2541-1004.
Y. H. Agustin and H. Kurniawan, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENILAIAN KINERJA DOSEN MENGGUNAKAN METODE WEIGHTED PRODUCT ( STUDI KASUS : STMIK PONTIANAK ),†pp. 177–182, 2015.
K. Eliyen, F. S. Efendi, P. Polinema, and K. Kediri, “Implementasi Metode Weighted Product untuk Penentuan Mustahiq Zakat,†vol. 1, 2019.
Frieyadie, “PENERAPAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHT (SAW) DALAM SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PROMOSI KENAIKAN JABATAN Frieyadie,†J. Pilar Nusa Mandiri Vol.XII, No. 1 Maret 2016 PENERAPAN, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2016.
A. Setiadi et al., “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( SAW ) Untuk Pemilihan Siswa Terbaik,†vol. 07, no. September, pp. 104–109, 2018.
H. Harsiti and H. Aprianti, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Smartphone dengan Menerapkan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),†JSiI (Jurnal Sist. Informasi), vol. 4, pp. 19–24, 2017, doi: 10.30656/jsii.v4i0.372.
S. Julianto and S. Setiawan, “Perancangan Sistem Informasi Pemesanan Tiket Bus Pada Po. Handoyo Berbasis Online,†Simatupang, Julianto Sianturi, Setiawan, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 11–25, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://journal.amikmahaputra.ac.id/index.php/JIT/article/view/56/48.
R. Rin and M. Salim, “ANALISIS MEAN SQUARE ERROR (MSE) PROSES PELATIHAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE BACKPROPAGATION DENGAN SELF ORGANIZING MAPS DAN NGUYEN WIDROW,†Anal. Mean Sq. Error Proses Pelatih. Menggunakanmetode Backpropagationdengan Selforgan. Dan Nguyen Widrow, no. MEAN SQUARE ERROR (MSE), p. 119, 2015.
