Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode SAW dan WP Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Tenaga Kontrak

 (*)Yusril Yusuf Mail (Universitas Darwan Ali, Sampit, Indonesia)
 Lukman Bachtiar (Universitas Darwan Ali, Sampit, Indonesia)

(*) Corresponding Author

Submitted: July 4, 2022; Published: September 30, 2022

Abstract

Employees at the Regional Secretariat office of East Kotawaringin Regency are divided into 2, namely Permanent Employees (Civil Employees) and Contract Employees (Contract Workers). Contract workers are employees who have non-permanent employment status, so it is necessary to evaluate the quality of their performance to determine the sustainability of the contract extension. There are 6 assessment criteria that are used as a reference for assessing the performance of contract workers, namely Individual Performance Targets, Service Orientation, Integrity, Commitment, Discipline, and Cooperation. The performance appraisal of contract workers at SETDA Kotim has been computerized, but there is still no method applied to the performance appraisal of contract workers, causing the performance appraisal of contract workers to be unstructured. From these problems, a decision support system is needed to be able to assist the process of assessing the performance of contract workers. The researcher conducted a comparative analysis between the SAW method and the WP method, which is expected to determine the right method to be applied in the performance appraisal of contract workers, and can assist the personnel department in processing the performance appraisal of contract workers. Based on the final calculation results, the SAW method and the WP method can be applied in assessing the performance of contract workers and produce the same ranking order, namely the alternative contract worker named A2 = Akmad Rosidi as the best alternative, followed by the other best alternatives A5, A1, A3, and A4. From the comparison results using the MSE (Mean Squared Error) method, the Weighted Product (WP) method produces a higher deviation value than the Simple Addative Weighting (SAW) method, with a comparison of the deviation values, namely the WP method = 228679.4811, while the SAW method = 227926, 7694. So, the Weighted Product (WP) method can be recommended in assessing the performance of contract workers at the Regional Secretariat of East Kotawaringin Regency.

Keywords


Performance Assessment; Contract worker; SPK; Simple Addative Weighting (SAW); Weighted Products (WP)

Full Text:

PDF


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 160 times
PDF - 68 times

References

V. A. Aria, “Gaya Kepemimpinan Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Terhadap Sebuah Organisasi”, J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol 53, no 9, bll 1689–1699, 2013.

A. M. Vinka, N. Michele, F. T. Industri, en F. Seni, “TEMATIK - Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Vol. 8, No. 1 JUNI 2021”, vol 8, no 1, bll 1–13, 2021.

M. Hamim, “Pemerintah Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur Sosialisasikan Peraturan Bupati Tentang Tenaga Kontrak”, Borneo News. https://www.borneonews.co.id/berita/115849-pemkab-kotim-sosialisasikan-perbup-tenaga-kontrak.

D. A. Trianggana, I. Kanedi, en B. Oktavia, “PERBANDINGAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING DAN WEIGHTED PRODUCT”, vol 18, no 1, bll 94–98, 2022.

L. Utari en R. Agustriani, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Untuk Merekomendasikan Penentuan Supplier Bahan Baku Kertas”, Teknois J. Ilm. Teknol. Inf. dan Sains, vol 9, no 1, bll 43–52, 2019, doi: 10.36350/jbs.v9i1.3.

F. Mahardika, U. Ummiyati, en M. Martanto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode WP (Weight Product) Pemilihan Minat Jurusan”, J. ICT Inf. Commun. Technol., vol 16, no 2, bll 53–57, 2017, doi: 10.36054/jict-ikmi.v16i2.23.

A. Agetia, G. Hendra, L. H. L, en Hariyanti, “Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) pada Universitas XYZ”, J. Ilmu Komput. Indones., vol 5, no 1, bll 6–12, 2020.

I. Ardhiyanto, V. Lusiana, en N. Mariana, “Implementasi Metode ( Wp ) Weighted Product Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Karyawan Terbaik Di”, Proceeding SINTAK, vol 3, bll 101–105, 2019.

E. D. Sri Mulyani, “Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode SAW Dengan WP Dalam Pemberian Pinjaman”, CogITo Smart J., vol 5, no 2, bl 239, 2019, doi: 10.31154/cogito.v5i2.151.239-251.

I. Anggraeni, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode SAW Dan Weight Product pada Pemilihan Calon Ketua Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa (BEM) Universitas Pakuan”, J. Komput. Terap., vol 3, no 2, bll 203–212, 2017, [Online]. Available at: http://jurnal.pcr.ac.id.

A. U. Aulia, D. Supriyadi, en R. D. Ramadhani, “Implementasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( Saw ) Dan Weighted Product ( Wp ) Dalam Pemilihan Guru Teladan ( Studi Kasus: MI MA’ARIF NU 1 AJIBARANG WETAN)”, Pros. SENDI_U, bll 259–264, 2018.

Asep Syaputra, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa Kurang Mampu Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw)”, J. Ilm. Bin. STMIK Bina Nusant. Jaya Lubuklinggau, vol 1, no 2, bll 50–55, 2019, doi: 10.52303/jb.v1i2.14.

F. Dwi, J. Sofalina, en A. Mansur, “Sistem Informas Penilaian Kinerja Sales Lapangan dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( SAW ) dan 360o”, vol 3, bll 333–340, 2022, doi: 10.30865/json.v3i3.3951.

M. A. Sembiring en M. F. larasati Sibuea, “Penerapan Metode Saw Untuk Pemberian Beasiswa Mahasiswa Berprestasi”, J. Sci. Soc. Res., vol 4307, no February, bll 12–15, 2019.

H. Mariono Rajagukguk en F. Masya, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product Berbasis Web (Studi Kasus : FIFGROUP Bekasi)”, J. Ilm. Fak. Ilmu Komput., vol 8, no 2, bll 68–77, 2019.

M. Jalil, Abdul; Ningrum, Ika; Muchtar, “Spk pemberian kredit menggunakan metode”, semanTIK, vol 3, no 1, bll 173–180, 2017.

R. P. Sari en E. Rasimin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kategori Skripsi Bagi Mahasiswa Sistem Informasi”, J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol 2, no 3, bl 339, 2021, doi: 10.30865/json.v2i3.3035.

R. A. Sugianto, R. Roslina, en Z. Situmorang, “Kombinasi Metode Simple Additive Weigthing dan Weigthed Product Untuk Seleksi Proposal Program Kreatifitas Mahasiswa”, J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol 5, no 2, bl 564, 2021, doi: 10.30865/mib.v5i2.2929.

Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode SAW dan WP Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Tenaga Kontrak

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Yusril Yusuf, Lukman Bachtiar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Sistem Komputer dan Informatika (JSON)
Dikelola oleh STMIK Budi Darma
Sekretariat : Jln. Sisingamangaraja No. 338 Telp 061-7875998
email : jurnal.json@gmail.com


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.