Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode SAW dan WP Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Tenaga Kontrak
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/json.v4i1.4421Keywords:
Performance Assessment, Contract worker, SPK, Simple Addative Weighting (SAW), Weighted Products (WP)Abstract
Employees at the Regional Secretariat office of East Kotawaringin Regency are divided into 2, namely Permanent Employees (Civil Employees) and Contract Employees (Contract Workers). Contract workers are employees who have non-permanent employment status, so it is necessary to evaluate the quality of their performance to determine the sustainability of the contract extension. There are 6 assessment criteria that are used as a reference for assessing the performance of contract workers, namely Individual Performance Targets, Service Orientation, Integrity, Commitment, Discipline, and Cooperation. The performance appraisal of contract workers at SETDA Kotim has been computerized, but there is still no method applied to the performance appraisal of contract workers, causing the performance appraisal of contract workers to be unstructured. From these problems, a decision support system is needed to be able to assist the process of assessing the performance of contract workers. The researcher conducted a comparative analysis between the SAW method and the WP method, which is expected to determine the right method to be applied in the performance appraisal of contract workers, and can assist the personnel department in processing the performance appraisal of contract workers. Based on the final calculation results, the SAW method and the WP method can be applied in assessing the performance of contract workers and produce the same ranking order, namely the alternative contract worker named A2 = Akmad Rosidi as the best alternative, followed by the other best alternatives A5, A1, A3, and A4. From the comparison results using the MSE (Mean Squared Error) method, the Weighted Product (WP) method produces a higher deviation value than the Simple Addative Weighting (SAW) method, with a comparison of the deviation values, namely the WP method = 228679.4811, while the SAW method = 227926, 7694. So, the Weighted Product (WP) method can be recommended in assessing the performance of contract workers at the Regional Secretariat of East Kotawaringin Regency.
References
V. A. Aria, “Gaya Kepemimpinan Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Terhadap Sebuah Organisasiâ€, J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol 53, no 9, bll 1689–1699, 2013.
A. M. Vinka, N. Michele, F. T. Industri, en F. Seni, “TEMATIK - Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Vol. 8, No. 1 JUNI 2021â€, vol 8, no 1, bll 1–13, 2021.
M. Hamim, “Pemerintah Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur Sosialisasikan Peraturan Bupati Tentang Tenaga Kontrakâ€, Borneo News. https://www.borneonews.co.id/berita/115849-pemkab-kotim-sosialisasikan-perbup-tenaga-kontrak.
D. A. Trianggana, I. Kanedi, en B. Oktavia, “PERBANDINGAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING DAN WEIGHTED PRODUCTâ€, vol 18, no 1, bll 94–98, 2022.
L. Utari en R. Agustriani, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Untuk Merekomendasikan Penentuan Supplier Bahan Baku Kertasâ€, Teknois J. Ilm. Teknol. Inf. dan Sains, vol 9, no 1, bll 43–52, 2019, doi: 10.36350/jbs.v9i1.3.
F. Mahardika, U. Ummiyati, en M. Martanto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode WP (Weight Product) Pemilihan Minat Jurusanâ€, J. ICT Inf. Commun. Technol., vol 16, no 2, bll 53–57, 2017, doi: 10.36054/jict-ikmi.v16i2.23.
A. Agetia, G. Hendra, L. H. L, en Hariyanti, “Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) pada Universitas XYZâ€, J. Ilmu Komput. Indones., vol 5, no 1, bll 6–12, 2020.
I. Ardhiyanto, V. Lusiana, en N. Mariana, “Implementasi Metode ( Wp ) Weighted Product Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Karyawan Terbaik Diâ€, Proceeding SINTAK, vol 3, bll 101–105, 2019.
E. D. Sri Mulyani, “Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode SAW Dengan WP Dalam Pemberian Pinjamanâ€, CogITo Smart J., vol 5, no 2, bl 239, 2019, doi: 10.31154/cogito.v5i2.151.239-251.
I. Anggraeni, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode SAW Dan Weight Product pada Pemilihan Calon Ketua Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa (BEM) Universitas Pakuanâ€, J. Komput. Terap., vol 3, no 2, bll 203–212, 2017, [Online]. Available at: http://jurnal.pcr.ac.id.
A. U. Aulia, D. Supriyadi, en R. D. Ramadhani, “Implementasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( Saw ) Dan Weighted Product ( Wp ) Dalam Pemilihan Guru Teladan ( Studi Kasus: MI MA’ARIF NU 1 AJIBARANG WETAN)â€, Pros. SENDI_U, bll 259–264, 2018.
Asep Syaputra, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa Kurang Mampu Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw)â€, J. Ilm. Bin. STMIK Bina Nusant. Jaya Lubuklinggau, vol 1, no 2, bll 50–55, 2019, doi: 10.52303/jb.v1i2.14.
F. Dwi, J. Sofalina, en A. Mansur, “Sistem Informas Penilaian Kinerja Sales Lapangan dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( SAW ) dan 360oâ€, vol 3, bll 333–340, 2022, doi: 10.30865/json.v3i3.3951.
M. A. Sembiring en M. F. larasati Sibuea, “Penerapan Metode Saw Untuk Pemberian Beasiswa Mahasiswa Berprestasiâ€, J. Sci. Soc. Res., vol 4307, no February, bll 12–15, 2019.
H. Mariono Rajagukguk en F. Masya, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product Berbasis Web (Studi Kasus : FIFGROUP Bekasi)â€, J. Ilm. Fak. Ilmu Komput., vol 8, no 2, bll 68–77, 2019.
M. Jalil, Abdul; Ningrum, Ika; Muchtar, “Spk pemberian kredit menggunakan metodeâ€, semanTIK, vol 3, no 1, bll 173–180, 2017.
R. P. Sari en E. Rasimin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kategori Skripsi Bagi Mahasiswa Sistem Informasiâ€, J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol 2, no 3, bl 339, 2021, doi: 10.30865/json.v2i3.3035.
R. A. Sugianto, R. Roslina, en Z. Situmorang, “Kombinasi Metode Simple Additive Weigthing dan Weigthed Product Untuk Seleksi Proposal Program Kreatifitas Mahasiswaâ€, J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol 5, no 2, bl 564, 2021, doi: 10.30865/mib.v5i2.2929.
